1993
DOI: 10.1109/8.220988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of two radio propagation channel impulse response determination techniques

Abstract: Absfract-A comparison of two radio propagation channel impulse response determination techniques is described. Presented are typical impulse response and transfer functions obtained from each measurement system. Also included for comparison are average impulse response envelopes and cumulative probability distributions for the rms delay spread of static indoor radio channels calculated from 120 measurements using each system. The comparisons show good agreement between results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the frequency domain transfer function measurement system [28] using a network analyzer can be used to measure the transfer function of the time-varying filter with (2). It is also experimentally shown that results from frequency domain measurement are similar to those of traditional time-domain measurement approach that is based on a spread spectrum system with a sliding correlator at the receiver [52]. Representing the measured frequency responses (sampled transfer function) in terms of the suggested model of (2) will help address a lot of practical issues of this model for system design, such as spatially correlated impulse responses representing samples of the channel at close locations which may run into tens of thousands of impulse response profiles [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, the frequency domain transfer function measurement system [28] using a network analyzer can be used to measure the transfer function of the time-varying filter with (2). It is also experimentally shown that results from frequency domain measurement are similar to those of traditional time-domain measurement approach that is based on a spread spectrum system with a sliding correlator at the receiver [52]. Representing the measured frequency responses (sampled transfer function) in terms of the suggested model of (2) will help address a lot of practical issues of this model for system design, such as spatially correlated impulse responses representing samples of the channel at close locations which may run into tens of thousands of impulse response profiles [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This technique is normally used to measure the frequency response of indoor radio channels, and is widely described in the literature [8], [14]- [16]. A block diagram of the channel sounder is given in Fig.…”
Section: A Measurement Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die meßtechnische Ermittlung [13,14] der Kanalimpulsantwort geschieht mit dem Netzwerkanalysator HP 8720 A und zwei Discone-Antennen [15]. Die gemessene Kanalimpulsantwort wird durch inverse Fouriertransformation der komplexen Übertragungsfunktion in dem Frequenzbereich von 1,9 GHz bis 2,1 GHz und einer Schrittweite von 10 …”
Section: Kanalimpulsantwortunclassified