1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(69)80022-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency, Picturability and Availability of Nouns in Aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the evidence for word frequency effects in aphasia stems from single word production and judgement tasks including naming, repetition, word reading and visual lexical decision (Bose & Buchanan, 2007;Bose, Lieshout, & Square, 2007;Bub, Cancelliere, & Kertesz, 1985;Cherney, 2004;Gerratt & Jones, 1987;Goodlass, Hyde, & Blumstein, 1969;Kittredge, Dell, Verkuilen, & Schwartz, 2008;Nozari & Dell, 2009;Schattka et al, 2010;Zingeser & Berndt, 1988). Schattka and colleagues (2010) showed an influence of word familiarity/word frequency on reading aloud in an eye tracking study of acquired dyslexia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the evidence for word frequency effects in aphasia stems from single word production and judgement tasks including naming, repetition, word reading and visual lexical decision (Bose & Buchanan, 2007;Bose, Lieshout, & Square, 2007;Bub, Cancelliere, & Kertesz, 1985;Cherney, 2004;Gerratt & Jones, 1987;Goodlass, Hyde, & Blumstein, 1969;Kittredge, Dell, Verkuilen, & Schwartz, 2008;Nozari & Dell, 2009;Schattka et al, 2010;Zingeser & Berndt, 1988). Schattka and colleagues (2010) showed an influence of word familiarity/word frequency on reading aloud in an eye tracking study of acquired dyslexia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aphasics, in general, show a concreteness advantage in word retrieval (Goodglass, Hyde & Blumstein, 1969) but not always (Goldstein, 1948;Warrington, 1975;Warrington & Shallice, 1984;Sirigu, Duhamel & Poncet, 1991;Breedin et al, 1994). For example, WarringtonÕs patient could define an abstract word such as supplication as Òmaking a serious request for helpÓ but could give no definition for the word alligator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) We attempted to balance the word lists for picturability (the degree to which a word can be represented by a picture) and name agreement so as to minimize the risk of prejudicing one condition over the other (after Goodglass et al, 1969). Full color, high- .…”
Section: Participant Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%