2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0420-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of the T307A, N680S, and -29G>A single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in Mexican subjects of Hispanic ancestry

Abstract: BackgroundFSHR SNPs may influence the ovarian sensitivity to endogenous and exogenous FSH stimulation. Given the paucity of data on the FSHR c.919A > G, c.2039A > G and − 29G > A SNPs in Hispanic population, we here analyzed their frequency distribution in Mexican mestizo women.MethodsSamples from 224 Mexican mestizo women enrolled in an IVF program as well as a genotype database from 8182 Mexican mestizo subjects, were analyzed for FSHR SNPs at positions c.919, c.2039 and − 29G > A. Association between the ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we found that GG FSH-R ( RS6166 ) carriers had higher ovarian resistance to exogenous gonadotropin and, consequently, had fewer oocytes compared with AA carriers (15). These findings were also confirmed in a more recent study (31). In addition, higher FSH basal levels and resistance to clomiphene citrate were observed in G allele carriers, supporting an higher receptorial resistance even to endogenous level of FSH (15, 27, 48, 49).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we found that GG FSH-R ( RS6166 ) carriers had higher ovarian resistance to exogenous gonadotropin and, consequently, had fewer oocytes compared with AA carriers (15). These findings were also confirmed in a more recent study (31). In addition, higher FSH basal levels and resistance to clomiphene citrate were observed in G allele carriers, supporting an higher receptorial resistance even to endogenous level of FSH (15, 27, 48, 49).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This observation was confirmed in a further larger study by Desai et al involving 100 women (16) where those with the AA genotype at position−29 were at higher risk for poor ovarian response in comparison to the other haplotypes (OR 8.63, 95% CI 1.84–45.79; P = 0.001). In contrast, other authors did not confirm significant effects of this variant concerning the ovarian response (31, 32, 51). The evidence regarding the clinical effect of the FSH-R − 29 G > A ( RS1394205 ) variant on OS was summarized in a recent meta-analysis, which showed that higher exogenous FSH consumption is required in homozygotes for the A allele than carriers of the G allele (15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Expression of the S680S FSHR variant in vivo has been associated with variations in the sensitivity of the FSHR to its cognate ligand ( 158 , 159 ), whereas in vitro this variant exhibited attenuated intracellular signaling kinetics, enhanced β-arresting recruitment and ligand-stimulated internalization, and decreased CREB-dependent gene transcription and nuclear PKA activation ( 160 , 161 ). The functional abnormalities of the S680S FSHR variant might be responsible for the altered response to exogenous FSH administration presented by women bearing the homozygous state as well as for the lower pregnancy rates observed in some particular populations ( 162 ).…”
Section: Fshr Domains and Signal Transductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Ilgaz et al showed there are no significant differences between infertile women and healthy controls for the Asn680Ser variant in the Turkish population, and the genotype landscape is consistent for both groups [ 36 ]. In addition, García-Jiménez and colleagues from Mexico indicated a non-significant association between 5′ UTR g.-29G>A and ovary response in IVF-treated women with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) [ 69 ]. However, most of the investigations indicated lower effects of altered FSHR function on the overall rate of ovarian stimulation and also, the number of studies for ethnic differences in FSHR responses is not high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%