2015
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.312.6509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of placenta previa in previously scarred and non scarred uterus

Abstract: Objective:To determine the frequency of placenta Previa in patients coming to a tertiary care unit with previously scarred and non-scarred uterus.Methods:A descriptive cross sectional study was carried on 114 cases who underwent caesarean sections (37 cases out of 645 cases with non scarred uterus and 77 cases from 721 cases with scarred uterus) in the department of obstetrics and gynecology Lady Willingdon Hospital from January 2008– December 2011.Results:Most patients (47.36%) were between 26-30 years age gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of placenta previa in scared uterus in this study was 54% and 46% in unscarred uterus whereas in the study by Majeed T et al the frequency of placenta previa in previously scarred uterus was 67.54% and non-scarred uterus was 32.45%. 17 In this study 61% of cases presented before the age of 30 years compared to 77% of cases by Faiz et al and 95% of cases by Rangaswamy et al 2,4 Maximum patients were in the age range of 26 to 30. Placenta previa was present mostly in multiparous with parity 1 to 5 that included 67% of cases similar to study by Iqbal K et al which included 48% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The frequency of placenta previa in scared uterus in this study was 54% and 46% in unscarred uterus whereas in the study by Majeed T et al the frequency of placenta previa in previously scarred uterus was 67.54% and non-scarred uterus was 32.45%. 17 In this study 61% of cases presented before the age of 30 years compared to 77% of cases by Faiz et al and 95% of cases by Rangaswamy et al 2,4 Maximum patients were in the age range of 26 to 30. Placenta previa was present mostly in multiparous with parity 1 to 5 that included 67% of cases similar to study by Iqbal K et al which included 48% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Placenta previa was found to be substantially correlated with prior uterine curettage, prior caesarean section, maternal age, and multiparity. 11 When compared to previous vaginal births, Safak Ozdemirci et al from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health and Teaching Hospital in Ankara, Turkey, explained in their study that previous caesarean births are more frequently linked to increased massive haemorrhage and placental adhesion anomalies in subsequent pregnancies with placenta previa. All subgroups of previous caesarean births had statistically greater rates of placental adhesion abnormalities than those of prior vaginal births (12.4 versus 32.7%.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In placenta percreta, placental villi penetrate beyond the myometrium into the uterine serosa and other pelvic organs like the Original Article urinary bladder, etc. 4 The incidence of placenta accreta ranges from 1/300 to 1/2000 pregnancies. 1 Placenta praevia, also known as placenta accreta spectrum, is an obstetric risk factor linked to antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum hemorrhage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%