1998
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199802000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of Convergence Insufficiency in Optometry Clinic Settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
3
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
78
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Orthoptic evaluation of vergence (made by using the cover test,bar of prisms,Maddox rod and synoptophore technique) revealed, for all subjects, one or more signs of vergence abnormalities (see Table 1 A,children examined and Table 1 B,normal children); e. g. distant near point of convergence (≥ 10 cm), exophoria (i. e. latent deviation of one eye when the other eye is covered) at far viewing that was larger than 3 ∆, and exophoria at near viewing larger than 6 ∆; the range of fusional vergence at far and at close viewing was also limited. According to Rouse et al [23,24] and Rainey [22] subjects S1, S3-S7, S10 and S12 were classified as having convergence abnormalities while subjects S2, S8, S9 and S11 had divergence abnormalities.…”
Section: Orthoptic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthoptic evaluation of vergence (made by using the cover test,bar of prisms,Maddox rod and synoptophore technique) revealed, for all subjects, one or more signs of vergence abnormalities (see Table 1 A,children examined and Table 1 B,normal children); e. g. distant near point of convergence (≥ 10 cm), exophoria (i. e. latent deviation of one eye when the other eye is covered) at far viewing that was larger than 3 ∆, and exophoria at near viewing larger than 6 ∆; the range of fusional vergence at far and at close viewing was also limited. According to Rouse et al [23,24] and Rainey [22] subjects S1, S3-S7, S10 and S12 were classified as having convergence abnormalities while subjects S2, S8, S9 and S11 had divergence abnormalities.…”
Section: Orthoptic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the CITT group developed a classification scheme for CI based on the following signs: exophoria at near vision greater than distance, ≥4 prismatic diopters (Δ), receded NPC, and reduced PFV range [28]. This classification system, as the authors declare in their study, is based on the signs most often associated with CI and many investigators have used it for prevalence, diagnosis and treatment purposes [1, 68, 1114, 18, 22, 28, 29, 40, 41, 44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4–6 In studies that used standardized definitions of CI, investigators have reported a prevalence of 4.2% to 6% in school and pediatric clinic settings. 5,10,11 There are, however, no known prevalence reports of convergence insufficiency among adult populations with which to compare the findings of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%