Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery

Cha, Hyun‐Suk; Kim, Ji Wan; Hwang, Jong-Hyun; Ahn, Kang-Min

doi:10.1186/s40902-016-0064-2

Cited by 65 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We observed a variation of 4-8 mm in average values of mm of bone at the beginning, significantly increasing to average values of 14 mm and more at 7 and 180 days after surgery (average percentage of increment 66%). In agreement with our study, Netto et al2016,using autogenous bone grafts, observed an average increase in bone formation of 38.45 ± 6.64% (less than that observed in our study) without significant variations between the times studied 25 . In conclusion, the use of bone grafts of nonautogenous human origin for the first time in this study showed a highly significant increase in bone formation in a short time and allowed the successful placement of dental implants.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Non-autologous human bone graft applied to upper maxillary sinus elevation

Bachur

Bornancini²,

Battisti³

et al. 2019

RevFacOdont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of non-autogenous human bone using the maxillary sinus floor elevation technique to create favorable conditions for the placement of dental implants. Longitudinal clinical study of partially edentulous patients of both genders (included in this study n = 11), older than 18 years. The data were recorded in three time periods: a) at the time of operation: b) control at 7 days, c) control at 180 days, these last two postoperative. The human bone grafts used were lyophilized and irradiated, with a particle size of 0.2 and 1 mm, manufactured by the Hemoderivatives of the National University of Córdoba. The increase in bone tissue was measured by digital orthopantomography, as the distance obtained between the lower basal edge and the resulting alveolar ridge. The population was composed of 8 women and 3 men. The increase in bone reached, at 7 and 180 days, was observed radiographically. There was a significant increase in the mean values of bone mm. Variations were 4-8 mm at the time of operation at mean values of ≥ 14 mm at 7 and 180 days after surgery. The results indicate that lyophilized human bone can be considered an alternative to bone grafts of animal origin or those of patients.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Non-autologous human bone graft applied to upper maxillary sinus elevation

Bachur

Bornancini²,

Battisti³

et al. 2019

RevFacOdont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Allogenic bone grafts also have an excellent safety profile, as a World Health Organization initiated study demonstrated no reports on transmission of any kind of infectious diseases associated with freeze‐dried bone allografts (FDBA) . Furthermore, the increasing demand for implant‐borne prosthesis is concordant with rising numbers of bone augmentation procedures, as these are often required to provide sufficient bone quantity prior to or with installation of a dental implant …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[24][25][26][27][28] Furthermore, the increasing demand for implant-borne prosthesis is concordant with rising numbers of bone augmentation procedures, as these are often required to provide sufficient bone quantity prior to or with installation of a dental implant. 5,6 Clinical data on the survival and success rates of allogenic bone blocks are excellent, ranging from 93.7% to 100%, however, allogenic bone blocks were reported to be more technique-sensitive and susceptible to infection when compared to autografts. 17,22 Complications reported with the application of allogenic bone grafts are almost exclusively related to contaminations, which can occur either during the adaptation of blocks to the defect's geometry, or, because of improper soft-tissue management resulting in membrane exposure, incision line opening and perforation of the mucosa.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bilateral maxillary augmentation using CAD/CAM manufactured allogenic bone blocks for restoration of congenitally missing teeth: A case report

Blume

Donkiewicz

Back

et al. 2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Various biomaterials have been successfully applied in alveolar bone regeneration, however, the reconstruction of extensive osseous defects remains challenging and is often unfeasible with granular grafting materials. Several studies have outlined allogenic bone blocks as valid alternative to autologous block grafting. Clinical Considerations In this report, we demonstrate the regeneration of two large osseous defects in the maxilla with allogenic bone blocks made from human donor bone. The bone blocks were customized using the CAD/CAM technology in order to enable the insertion of four dental implants. Conclusions Both blocks perfectly matched the defect geometry, showed limited resorption, led to the formation of sufficient amounts of mineralized bone in both horizontal and vertical dimensions and enabled the installation of implants according to the treatment plan. The implementation of innovative technologies for individualization of allogenic bone blocks simplifies the restoration of complex and extensive osseous defects and poses great benefits for both practitioners and patients. Clinical Significance The here presented procedure demonstrates the successful regeneration of two extensive osseous defects in a patient suffering from hypodontia using two CAD/CAM manufactured allogenic bone blocks, rendering the procedure far less invasive as compared to guided bone regeneration carried out with autologous transplants. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report that radiographically demonstrates the new formation of a cortical bone layer following block grafting with solely cancellous bone blocks.

show abstract

“…Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a widely used technique for bone regeneration on alveolar bone defects [1,2]. GBR uses a membrane as a physical barrier to prevent epithelial and connective tissue in the bone defect [3][4][5][6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Resorbable Membrane Materials for Guided Bone Regeneration

2018

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Membranes are used for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in bone defects. Resorbable membranes of collagen or aliphatic polyesters that do not require secondary surgery for removal, unlike non-resorbable membranes, have been marketed for GBR. Platelet rich fibrin membrane and silk-based membranes have recently been assessed as membranes for GBR. Studies have been conducted on resorbable membranes with new materials to improve physical properties and bone regeneration without any adverse inflammatory reactions. However, clinical research data remain limited. More studies are needed to commercialize such membranes.

show abstract

Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery

Cited by 65 publications

References 19 publications

Non-autologous human bone graft applied to upper maxillary sinus elevation

Non-autologous human bone graft applied to upper maxillary sinus elevation

Bilateral maxillary augmentation using CAD/CAM manufactured allogenic bone blocks for restoration of congenitally missing teeth: A case report

New Resorbable Membrane Materials for Guided Bone Regeneration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About