2008 International Symposium on Telecommunications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/istel.2008.4651273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency modulation sound parameter identification using novel hybrid evolutionary algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the best selection for this parameter. A comparison between the authors' obtained results and results reported in Vakil-Baghmisheh et al, (2008) A comparison between the real wave and the estimated wave by SPSO for values of cost function equal to 0.5 and 1.0E-10 are shown in Figures 5 and 6. As this figure shows, for a cost 0.5 some of differences are observable, whereas for the cost value of 1.0E-10 two figures are not distinguishable.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is the best selection for this parameter. A comparison between the authors' obtained results and results reported in Vakil-Baghmisheh et al, (2008) A comparison between the real wave and the estimated wave by SPSO for values of cost function equal to 0.5 and 1.0E-10 are shown in Figures 5 and 6. As this figure shows, for a cost 0.5 some of differences are observable, whereas for the cost value of 1.0E-10 two figures are not distinguishable.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…of the frequency modulated sound model given in Equation 3to approximate the real sound wave given in Equation 4, so as to minimize the sum of squared-error between the samples of measured and the estimated data (Vakil-Baghmisheh et al, 2008).…”
Section: Frequency Modulation Sound Paprameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, a value equals to 10 is considered for m in all algorithms. A comparison among the proposed algorithms in this research, and results of different algorithms reported in [28] is presented in Table 6. Based on these results, only the proposed algorithms in this research obtain a success rate of 100 on all threshold values.…”
Section: F(g )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of performance of the proposed algorithms in this research and results reported in[28] on nestedmodulator FM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%