2011
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2010.2101998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Domain Multiplexed Readout of TES Detector Arrays With Baseband Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), corresponds to 10 pA/ √ Hz, and it is clear that the actual noise level stays below this line over the entire relevant frequency range. This implies a factor 5 improvement with respect to previous experiments [10], and indicates that the read-out noise requirements in Table 1 are feasible. The difference between the two noise levels in the left panel is the signal picked up by the SQUID in its set point, and consists at offresonance frequencies mainly of SQUID wide-band noise.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1), corresponds to 10 pA/ √ Hz, and it is clear that the actual noise level stays below this line over the entire relevant frequency range. This implies a factor 5 improvement with respect to previous experiments [10], and indicates that the read-out noise requirements in Table 1 are feasible. The difference between the two noise levels in the left panel is the signal picked up by the SQUID in its set point, and consists at offresonance frequencies mainly of SQUID wide-band noise.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The experiments described in this paper involved two different set-ups. The first is a repetition of a previous set-up used in the IXO XMS development activity [10]. Several improvements were made to reduce the read-out noise, including an upgrade of the SQUID to the PTB C5 series with bias-current feedback [11], and an LNA with lower noise.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The '×' shows the value of R sh that minimizes this ratio for each value of G, and thus that places the lowest burden on the multiplexed readout. When multiplied by the multiplexing frame time (defined by the row-dwell time and the number of multiplexed rows, or t fr = t row N rows ) the dynamic-slew density is the "dynamic-range density" (units of √ Hz) used [6] in discussion of frequency-domain multiplexing techniques While the five models differ in G, and thus in τ nat , by more than a factor of three, their optimal values of τ crit range only from 200 µs to 235 µs. In addition to being easiest to multiplex in general, the higher-ETF models (low-G, low-R sh ) have two further advantages: (1) they suffer less thermal crosstalk; and (2) more of their multiplexing degradation is due to finite t rec , so when Athena's count rates were low during observations of dim sources, t rec could be extended to improve ΔE FWHM substantially.…”
Section: Squid Noise and Slew Rate: Dynamic-slew Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRON has been developing frequency division multiplexing (FDM) to readout Transition Edge Sensor (TES) bolometers for the focal plane array of SPICA [1]. In FDM, each TES is biased by a sinusoidal carrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%