2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency domain characterization of torque in tumbling ball mills using DEM modelling: Application to filling level monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To clarify the different comminution mechanisms (impact, friction) operating in the two media configurations (single-ball, multi-bead), we investigated the dynamics of the jar/media system using discrete element method (DEM) simulations [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discrete Element Simulations Of Ball and Bead Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To clarify the different comminution mechanisms (impact, friction) operating in the two media configurations (single-ball, multi-bead), we investigated the dynamics of the jar/media system using discrete element method (DEM) simulations [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discrete Element Simulations Of Ball and Bead Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DEM is a numerical method to address the kinematic and mechanical behaviour of complex granular systems involving many discrete units with certain shapes and masses. It has been widely used in ball mills [18,36] to determine the particles behaviour and the torque and energy of ball mills in different working conditions. In DEM each particle is tracked and its motion is governed by Newton's second law: (17) where i (=1, 2, 3) denotes the x, y and z coordinate directions, respectively; F i is the out-of-balance force component of the particle; V i is the translational velocity; m is the mass of the particle; M i is the out-of-balance moment due to the contacts;  i is the rotational velocity; I is the rotational inertia of the particle; g is the global damping coe cient; dt is the time step.…”
Section: Discrete Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the AE signal processing methods can be classified into three categories: (i) signal processing, (ii) feature extraction, and (iii) pattern recognition. The most important and widely used (Qin et al, 2018) × (Karakus & Perez, 2014) × × × × (Bastari et al, 2011) × (Parsian et al, 2017) × × × (Marinescu & Axinte, 2009) × × (Xiao, Hurich et al, 2018) × (Li et al, 2018) × × (Buj-Corral et al,, 2018) × (Shaffer et al,, 2018) × × × (Wang et al, 2017) × × (Rivero et al, 2008) × (Flegner et al, 2014) × (Feng & Yi, 2017) × (Yari et al, 2017) × (Yari & Bagherpour, 2018 (a&b)) × (Shreedharan et al, 2014) × (Kostur & Futo, 2007) × ( Kawamura et al, 2017) × (Pedrayes et al, 2018) × × (Gradl et al, 2012) × × × (Vardhan et al, 2009) × × × (Beheshtizadeh et al, 2017) × (Miklusova et al, 2006) × × × × (Goyal & Pabla, 2016) × (Liew & Wang, 1998) × × (Kong et al, 2015) × (Jain et al, 2001) The Mining-Geology-Petroleum Engineering Bulletin and the authors ©, 2019, pp. 19-32, DOI: 10.17794/rgn.2019.4.3 methods of the first category (signal processing) include: time series statistical models, Short Time Fourier Transform (STFT), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Wavelet Packet Decomposition (WPD), Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT), Wigner-Ville distribution, signal spectrum analysis, Adaptive Line Enhancer (ALE), wavelet transform, and the Peak-Hold-Down-Sample (PHDS) algorithm.…”
Section: Acoustic Signal Processing Feature Extraction and Pattern Rmentioning
confidence: 99%