1967
DOI: 10.1002/rds196726547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Dependence of VLF Fading at Sunrise

Abstract: The sunrise variations of phase and amplitude of VLF signals received over a single long path, at frequencies between 9.2 and 26.1 kHz are interpreted as interference between waveguide modes. The deduced differences in phase velocity and attenuation rates of the first two modes are in accordance with theoretical calculations and with earlier observations in a more restricted frequency range.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation, according to Walker, is the existence of some second mode in the light part of the path when this is small, thus affecting the time of occurrence of signal minima. A similar anomaly, becoming more severe at higher frequencies, was observed by Steele and Crombie (1967). Ries (1967) found that the first two phase steps at sunrise tended to split into substeps, with several small amplitude minima.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible explanation, according to Walker, is the existence of some second mode in the light part of the path when this is small, thus affecting the time of occurrence of signal minima. A similar anomaly, becoming more severe at higher frequencies, was observed by Steele and Crombie (1967). Ries (1967) found that the first two phase steps at sunrise tended to split into substeps, with several small amplitude minima.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…If the direct second mode signal were responsible for the anomalous signal minima, a greater variation with frequency would be expected. Steele and Crombie (1967) recorded the same transmissions from NPM and Haiku at Boulder, which is almost on the NPM-Washington great-circle path approximately 2.4 Mm from Washington. For the NPM-Boulder path, the night interference minima occur at the same value of DN, but the day interference pattern shifts towards the transmitter a distance of 2.4 Mm, a little more than one cycle of night interference.…”
Section: Npm-washingtonmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The distance D moved by the terminator along the propagation path between signal minima is a measure of the difference in phase velocity between the first and second modes [33] and is given by the simple relationship Values of D as a function of frequency have been made by many people with a considerable amount of agreement (e.g. [40] [41]). An example (Fig.23) provides evidence of higher values of D for propagation to the east relative to propagation to the west at middle latitudes [41].…”
Section: Terminator-generated Modal Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walker [1965] has reported the presence of anomalous TTs when the sunrise line was close to the receiver. In similar conditions, Steele and Crombie [1967] have reported abnormal TTs and emphasize a…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Walker [] has reported the presence of anomalous TTs when the sunrise line was close to the receiver. In similar conditions, Steele and Crombie [] have reported abnormal TTs and emphasize a possible dependence with the VLF frequency. Lynn [] reported anomalous D distances recorded when the Terminator Line was within ± 20° latitude of the geomagnetic equator for an east‐to‐west oriented transequatorial VLF propagation path.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%