Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014rs005582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the VLF modal interference distance using the South America VLF Network (SAVNET)

Abstract: Pronounced amplitude minima are observed during the subionospheric propagation of VLF waves at times (Terminator Times) when the Terminator Line crosses given locations along the propagation path. The distance between such two successive minima is called the modal interference distance D, which is related to nighttime mode propagation in the Earth-ionosphere waveguide. Therefore, the temporal behavior of the distance D can bring information on the dynamics of the nighttime lower ionosphere and on the presence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we use the notation D SSki = V T [SS k À SS i ] in order to distinguish between each distance obtained from two successive minima, for example, D SS21 = V T [SS 2 À SS 1 ], D SS32 = V T [SS 3 À SS 2 ] and so on. We note from [Samanes et al, 2015] where V N1 and V N2 have been taken from those tabulated by Wait and Spies [1964]. The mean experimental value of D MS estimated for NLK-Suva path is about 16% [((2507-2103)/2507) × 100 = 16%] higher than that for NWC-Suva path.…”
Section: 1002/2016rs006221mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here we use the notation D SSki = V T [SS k À SS i ] in order to distinguish between each distance obtained from two successive minima, for example, D SS21 = V T [SS 2 À SS 1 ], D SS32 = V T [SS 3 À SS 2 ] and so on. We note from [Samanes et al, 2015] where V N1 and V N2 have been taken from those tabulated by Wait and Spies [1964]. The mean experimental value of D MS estimated for NLK-Suva path is about 16% [((2507-2103)/2507) × 100 = 16%] higher than that for NWC-Suva path.…”
Section: 1002/2016rs006221mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mean D MS calculated using the TT method for NWC-Suva and NLK-Suva VLF propagation paths is 1979 ± 251 km and 2722 ± 266 km, respectively. We have used the TT method in a similar manner as described by Samanes et al [2015]. The estimate of the D MS for Figure 2 data using TT method was Radio Science 10.1002/2016RS006221 computed as follows: (1) we determined the sunrise and sunset amplitude minima times; (2) both the transmitter-receiver paths (NWC-Suva path and NLK-Suva path) were divided into 1300 parts;…”
Section: 1002/2016rs006221mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The decreasing reading during sunrise and sunset is called terminator time (TT). It is a time when the terminator line crosses given locations along the VLF propagation path creating amplitude minima at the receiver [10]. It is also defined as the time of amplitude minimum that coincides very well with the time of maximum rate of phase change [11].…”
Section: Diurnal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%