GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2017.8254928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and Timing Synchronization for In-Band Full-Duplex OFDM System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, a WiFi-like frame structure is assumed with a nonoverlapped short preamble, shown in Fig. 2, for IBFD synchronization purposes as discussed in [6]. In order to apply self-interference cancellation, there are two assumptions: a) channel is quasi-static within the frame which is reasonable for low-mobility environments.…”
Section: In-band Full Duplex Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, a WiFi-like frame structure is assumed with a nonoverlapped short preamble, shown in Fig. 2, for IBFD synchronization purposes as discussed in [6]. In order to apply self-interference cancellation, there are two assumptions: a) channel is quasi-static within the frame which is reasonable for low-mobility environments.…”
Section: In-band Full Duplex Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) SI and SOI are synchronized to use the knowledge of the interferer signal in the cancellation. Prior work such as [6] present IBFD synchronization techniques that have been experimentally verified, utilizing nonoverlapped short preamble.…”
Section: In-band Full Duplex Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies in [1,2] did not consider FOs between the downlink signal and the uplink signals of the other UEs, and therefore, only the intra-SB self-interference (SI) caused by FD was the major performance-limiting factor. Meanwhile, the studies in [3,4] considered FOs in OFDMbased FD. However, they considered the FOs on the BS side [3] or in a two-node system [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the studies in [3,4] considered FOs in OFDMbased FD. However, they considered the FOs on the BS side [3] or in a two-node system [4]. Hence, the U2D-IU-ISBI was not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, digital SI cancellation (SIC) exploits the fact that the FD receiver has knowledge of the intended transmit signal in the digital domain, making it possible to reconstruct the SI and then cancel it. However, due to the impacts of the hardware imperfections and the propagation environment, perfect time synchronization between the reconstructed and received SI is almost impossible [3]. The SI propagation channel usually includes the direct path (DP) through the antenna interface device, which has a limited isolation for the high-power transmitted signal, and the multipath reflection paths (RPs) that are created by objects within the environment [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%