‘Frenemies'? Images of the US‐EU relations in Asia‐Pacific media

Chaban, Natalia; Bain, Jessica; Stats, Katrina

doi:10.1080/19460171.2007.9518509

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The third approach is contestation of framing, which includes hybrids with the explanatory approach (McBeth & Shanahan, 2004) and an approach that focuses on the contestation of media frames among world powers (Chaban et al, 2007). The approach is rooted in the argumentative turn literature in political science (e.g., Fischer, 2003;Fischer & Forester, 1993;Fischer & Gottweis, 2012;Schön & Rein, 1994;Schön & Rein, 1996;Stone, 1989;Yanow, 1993), and framing in social movement scholarship (e.g., Benford & Snow, 2000), and is concerned with framing as strategic action policy actors use to influence policy outcomes.…”

Section: Contestation Approach To Framingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Approaches to policy framing: deepening a conversation across perspectives

Dodge,

Metze

2024

Policy Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since Rein and Schön developed their approach to policy framing analysis in the1990s, a range of approaches to policy framing have emerged to inform our understanding of policy processes. Prior attempts to illuminate the diversity of approaches to framing in public policy have largely “stayed in their lane,” making distinctions in approaches within shared epistemic communities. The aim in this paper is to map different approaches to framing used in policy sciences journals, to articulate what each contributes to the understanding of the policy process, and to provide a heuristic to aid in deciding how to use the diverse approaches in framing analysis and to further the dialogue across different approaches. To develop the heuristic, we manually coded and analyzed 68 articles published between 1997 and 2018 using “frame” or “framing” in their title or abstract from four policy journals: Critical Policy Studies, Journal of European Public Policy, Policy Sciences, and Policy Studies Journal. We identified five approaches, which we label: sensemaking, discourse, contestation, explanatory and institutional. We have found that these approaches do not align with a simple binary between interpretive and positivist but show variation, particularly along the lines of aims, methodology and methods. In the discussion, we suggest that these five approaches raise four key questions that animate framing studies in policy analysis: (1) Do frames influence policies or are policies manifestations of framing? (2) What is the role of frame contestation in policy conflict? (3) How can the study of frames or framing reveal unheard voices? And (4) how do certain frames/framings become dominant? By introducing these questions, we offer a fresh way scholars might discuss frames and framing in the policy sciences across approaches, to highlight the distinct yet complementary ways they illuminate policy processes.

show abstract

Section: Contestation Approach To Framingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Approaches to policy framing: deepening a conversation across perspectives

Dodge,

Metze

2024

Policy Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Este concepto, el de frenemy, establece una condición donde se entremezclan las características de amigo y enemigo, es decir la interacción simultánea de dinámicas de conflicto y cooperación entre los dos estados (Wilson-Rowe, 2020: 1). Este concepto de la política mundial ha migrado desde los análisis más periodísticos y divulgativos hacia el espacio académico, viajando desde enfoques más realistas vinculados a relaciones entre Estados hacia campos más críticos y antifundacionalistas de las relaciones internacionales, que incluyen un análisis de actores más allá de los propios Estados (Chaban et. al, 2007;Haas, 2022), e incluso un análisis de deconstrucción del propio término (Nikolic y Milic, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Las relaciones de cooperación y rivalidad entre Turquía y Siria: impacto del conflicto sirio en la política exterior turca y las implicaciones internacionales

Calatrava¹,

Cenit

2022

REIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Siria y Turquía son un ejemplo claro de frenemies: con relaciones determinadas por dinámicas de conflicto y cooperación desde su constitución como Estados. Después de una situación de grave tensión en los años ochenta y noventa, se produce una década de acercamiento. Esta dinámica se rompe con la “Primavera Árabe” y el inicio del conflicto sirio. En este artículo entendemos esta circunstancia como un “episodio contencioso”, capaz de cambiar las relaciones amigo/enemigo; para ello se estudian los acontecimientos y eventos que llevaron en los primeros meses del conflicto al cambio del sentido de estas relaciones y las implicaciones internacionales.

show abstract

Analyzing frenemies: An Arctic repertoire of cooperation and rivalry

Rowe

2020

Political Geography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

‘Frenemies'? Images of the US‐EU relations in Asia‐Pacific media

Cited by 5 publications

References 30 publications

Approaches to policy framing: deepening a conversation across perspectives

Approaches to policy framing: deepening a conversation across perspectives

Las relaciones de cooperación y rivalidad entre Turquía y Siria: impacto del conflicto sirio en la política exterior turca y las implicaciones internacionales

Analyzing frenemies: An Arctic repertoire of cooperation and rivalry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About