2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

French RSE-M and RCC-MR code appendices for flaw analysis: Presentation of the fracture parameters calculation—Part IV: Cracked elbows

Abstract: Two French nuclear codes include flaw assessment procedures: the RSE-M Code ''Rules for In-service Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components'' and the RCC-MR code ''Design and Construction rules for mechanical components of FBR nuclear islands and high temperature applications''. Development of analytical methods has been made for the last 10 years through a collaboration between CEA, EDF and AREVA-NP, and through R&D actions involving CEA and IRSN. These activities have led to unification of the common met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each case with available FE J results, elastic uncracked-body stress analysis is carried out using the elbow elastic nominal stress calculation method proposed by Marie et al (2007) to determine the required model loads for the local limit load model and the local limit load based reference stress, 𝜎 ref , is evaluated from Eqn. (13).…”
Section: Comparison Of J Values Between Fe and Predictions With Various Limit Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each case with available FE J results, elastic uncracked-body stress analysis is carried out using the elbow elastic nominal stress calculation method proposed by Marie et al (2007) to determine the required model loads for the local limit load model and the local limit load based reference stress, 𝜎 ref , is evaluated from Eqn. (13).…”
Section: Comparison Of J Values Between Fe and Predictions With Various Limit Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances it may be found that in order to meet the geometric limits a relatively large thickness is required (i.e. approaching or exceeding the nominal thickness) and hence alternative reference stress solutions should be considered, such as the use of the RSE-M approach [7].…”
Section: Plastic Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, numerous studies of the dynamics of the movement of single-phase, multiphase flows in the shaped elements of pipeline systems, their erosive wear, stress state is small are presented in publications, and, mainly, they relate to water pipelines and pneumatic pipelines of small diameters. The geometric shape of defects in all analytical, numerical studies of the stress state of defective shaped elements [22][23] is extremely simplified (idealized to spherical or rectangular) and does not correspond to the real geometric shape of such defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%