1994
DOI: 10.1002/pola.1994.080320403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free radical exit in emulsion polymerization. II. Model discrimination via experiment

Abstract: SYNOPSISIn emulsion polymerizations, desorption (exit) from latex particles of monomeric radical species that arise from transfer can be a n important determinant of the overall kinetics. An examination of various methodologies for the testing of postulated free radical exit mechanisms is made. These utilize the model descriptions for the exit process presented in the accompanying article of Casey et al., employing data consisting of conversion as a function of time for the approach to steady state polymerizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in the previous section showed an interesting feature: After the redox initiator feed was switched off, the concavity of the rate data was initially the opposite to that expected (as mechanistically predicted for a sudden stoppage in initiation and as observed in g relaxation data [49]) if initiation had ceased, such as observed in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Redox Initiation Rate Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented in the previous section showed an interesting feature: After the redox initiator feed was switched off, the concavity of the rate data was initially the opposite to that expected (as mechanistically predicted for a sudden stoppage in initiation and as observed in g relaxation data [49]) if initiation had ceased, such as observed in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Redox Initiation Rate Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Using the feed rate and aqueous termination rate coefficient given previously together with the saturated water phase concentration for styrene (C sat W Z 1 !10 K3 M [30]), the established value for z for styrene and persulfate initiator (zZ2-this assumes that the ionic species has a single change and is hydrophilic, like SO K 4 ; note that the value of z is different for more hydrophobic initiating entities [5]), the aqueous phase propagation rate coefficient (k p,aq Z4k p M K1 s K1 [7,49]) and a typical experimental value for N p (5!10 16 dm K3 ), the initiator efficiency is calculated to be approximately 10%. It is fortuitous to note for the purposes of this study that the choices for parameters such as k p,aq are not overly critical as reasonable changes to these numbers do not drastically affect either the efficiency of the diffusion-limited entry of hydrophobic radicals or the comparison of their entry rates with the hydrophilic radicals.…”
Section: Radical Capture Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The more water-soluble the leaving group (3) is, the greater the extent of exit is. 16 The leaving radicals from cumyl RAFT (2-phenylprop-2-yl dithiobenzoate) and EMA RAFT [2-(ethoxycarbonyl)propyl-2-yl dithiobenzoate] are cumyl radical (3a) and 2-(ethoxycarbonyl)prop-2-yl radical (3b), respectively. The coefficient for desorption of a monomeric free radical (exit) from a particle with swollen radius r s is given by the following: 12…”
Section: Probability Of Exit Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the seed must be as small as possible to explore the effects of exit because exit is proportional to the inverse of the particle radius squared (see eq 1). 16,18 However, the seed must have a minimum size; otherwise, the concentration of monomer will change drastically during particle growth. This, to a good approximation, is determined by the Morton equation 19,20 and shows that for particles with unswollen radii greater than 20 nm, the monomer concentrations inside the particles remain relatively constant during interval II.…”
Section: Design Of the Seedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard models for entry and exit [19,36,37] require a knowledge of the following rate parameters: k p (it is assumed here that this has the same value in particle and water phases), k d (the initiator dissociation rate coefficient), z (the critical degree of polymerization for entry), k 1 p (the propagation rate coefficient of a monomeric radical inside the particle), k t,aq (the rate coefficient for termination of oligomeric radicals in the water phase), C sat W (the water solubility of monomer), k tr (the rate coefficient for transfer to monomer), r spont (the rate coefficient for spontaneous, or 'thermal', entry of radicals into the particles), and D w (the diffusion coefficient of a monomeric radical in water). The values of n calculated using the parameters in the text and in Table 4 are given in Table 3.…”
Section: Rate Of Polymerization Of Styrenementioning
confidence: 99%