2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free‐breathing, non‐ECG, continuous myocardial T1 mapping with cardiovascular magnetic resonance multitasking

Abstract: Purpose To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of a free‐breathing, non‐electrocardiogram (ECG), continuous myocardial T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) mapping technique adapted from the Multitasking framework. Methods The Multitasking framework is adapted to quantify both myocardial native T1 and ECV with a free‐breathing, non‐ECG, continuous acquisition T1 mapping method. We acquire interleaved high–spatial resolution image data and high–temporal resolution auxiliary data following inversion‐recovery pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
90
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average reconstruction time for 2D MRF with HD‐PROST was ~10 min per data set. Additional comparisons with single‐contrast PROST reconstruction (i.e., reconstructing each singular image independently) and with a global low‐rank tensor decomposition (in the spirit of cardiac multitasking) are provided in Supporting Information Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average reconstruction time for 2D MRF with HD‐PROST was ~10 min per data set. Additional comparisons with single‐contrast PROST reconstruction (i.e., reconstructing each singular image independently) and with a global low‐rank tensor decomposition (in the spirit of cardiac multitasking) are provided in Supporting Information Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of reconstruction techniques, also known as the globally (GLR) or locally low‐rank (LLR) methods, have been efficiently used in many applications such as T 2 mapping or dynamic contrast enhanced MRI . More recently, high‐order tensor decomposition techniques, exploiting global correlation, have been efficiently used to allow for highly accelerated multi‐dimensional cardiac MRI acquisitions . Although those techniques have shown promise for motion‐resolved quantitative cardiac imaging by efficiently solving a global low‐rank tensor decomposition, they do not exploit the strong non‐local correlations between neighboring patches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetization evolution during the acquisition is characteristic of a specific combination of T 1 and T 2 , and thus the T 1 and T 2 values can be simultaneously determined by pattern matching. CMR multitasking is another computational approach to parametric mapping, where continuous golden‐angle radial data are acquired following an inversion pulse without ECG gating or breath‐holding . Low‐rank tensor modeling is used to resolve both cardiac and respiratory motion during reconstruction, yielding dynamic T 1 maps as a function of cardiac or respiratory phase.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the magnetic resonance multitasking technique using 2D radial acquisition has been proposed for motionresolved quantitative myocardial T 1 and T 2 imaging without breath-holding or ECG triggering. 15,16 2D myocardial mapping is typically performed with thick slices to avoid the influence of through-plane motion 13 and low SNR. 3D acquisitions can overcome these limitations and provide whole heart coverage for comprehensive characterization of diffuse diseases of myocardium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%