2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fraud detection system: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
250
0
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 452 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
1
250
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Othman et al (2015) dengan penelitiannya yang dilakukan di wilayah sektor publik Malaysia menyimpulkan bahwa, auditor internal di dalam sektor publik memainkan peran yang cukup penting dalam mendeteksi dan mencegah fraud. Penelitian yang dilakukan Abdallah, Maarof, & Zainal (2016) yang mengamati fraud di sistem e-commerce menyimpulkan bahwa, dalam melawan fraud, pencegahan saja tidak cukup, namun juga diperlukan pendeteksian dengan menggunakan sistem-sistem baru dalam teknologi. Munteanu et al (2016) yang meneliti entitas publik di Rumania menyimpulkan bahwa, internal auditor harus mempertimbangkan eksistensi dari risiko dan kesalahan pendeteksian serta harus bersikap skeptis jika terdapat beberapa laporan yang patut dicurigai.…”
Section: "There Is No Such Thing As a Small Fraud -unclassified
“…Othman et al (2015) dengan penelitiannya yang dilakukan di wilayah sektor publik Malaysia menyimpulkan bahwa, auditor internal di dalam sektor publik memainkan peran yang cukup penting dalam mendeteksi dan mencegah fraud. Penelitian yang dilakukan Abdallah, Maarof, & Zainal (2016) yang mengamati fraud di sistem e-commerce menyimpulkan bahwa, dalam melawan fraud, pencegahan saja tidak cukup, namun juga diperlukan pendeteksian dengan menggunakan sistem-sistem baru dalam teknologi. Munteanu et al (2016) yang meneliti entitas publik di Rumania menyimpulkan bahwa, internal auditor harus mempertimbangkan eksistensi dari risiko dan kesalahan pendeteksian serta harus bersikap skeptis jika terdapat beberapa laporan yang patut dicurigai.…”
Section: "There Is No Such Thing As a Small Fraud -unclassified
“…Hence, in addition to Fraud Prevention Systems (FPSs) integrating Fraud Detection Systems (FDSs) is considerably important. FDSs can be subdivided into as "Anomaly based fraud detection", "Misuse based fraud detection" and "Hybrid of anomaly and misuse http: //dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.12.02.26 Corresponding Author: Busra Alma Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference eISSN: 314 detection" as stated by (Abdallah, Maarof & Zainal, 2016). Fraud detection techniques can be classified as supervised or unsupervised techniques.…”
Section: Fraud Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised techniques use a set of known fraudulent cases for identifying scores for new data whereas unsupervised ones do not deal with previously identified sets of observations (Bolton & Hand, 2002). Intelligent systems comprising neural networks, fuzzy systems, GA, data mining, rule-based, supervised/unsupervised methods and statistical techniques are among techniques used in FDSs (Abdallah, Maarof & Zainal, 2016). Because of the limitations of expert systems or systems' dependence on pre-defined rules, FDSs based on data mining and integrating various statistical, artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques are more preferable.…”
Section: Fraud Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They analyzed the frontiers of researches, emerging hot spots and new trends in different fields. Abdallah, Maarof and Zainal [14] provided a systematic and comprehensive overview of these issues and challenges that obstruct the performance of Fraud detection system, and analyzed potential research trends of Fraud detection system in near future. As a new computing paradigm, cloud computing has received a lot of attention from enterprises and has being integrated or applied to enterprise architectures.…”
Section: Academic Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%