2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.030501
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Franson Interference Generated by a Two-Level System

Abstract: We report a Franson interferometry experiment based on correlated photon pairs generated via frequency-filtered scattered light from a near-resonantly driven two-level semiconductor quantum dot. In contrast to spontaneous parametric down conversion and four-wave mixing, this approach can produce single pairs of correlated photons. We have measured a Franson visibility as high as 66%, which goes beyond the classical limit of 50% and approaches the limit of violation of Bell's inequalities (70.7%).Introduction-E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same assertion is made in a recent publication by Peiris et al [58], which states that their achieved visibilities of 66 % in a Franson setup "approach the visibility required to violate Bell's inequalities (70.7 %)". However, this conclusion is inaccurate for the Franson interferometer, as our discussion on the postselection loophole in section 6.2 shows.…”
Section: Interferometric Visibilitysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The same assertion is made in a recent publication by Peiris et al [58], which states that their achieved visibilities of 66 % in a Franson setup "approach the visibility required to violate Bell's inequalities (70.7 %)". However, this conclusion is inaccurate for the Franson interferometer, as our discussion on the postselection loophole in section 6.2 shows.…”
Section: Interferometric Visibilitysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…We consider the lack of security in the standard Franson interferometric setup to be proven beyond doubt, but it is obvious we still have ways to go in educating the scientific community on this issue. In fact, publication F is a comment on an experimental paper that was published as recently as 2017 [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We submitted our comment to arXiv and PRL on the 15 th of March 2017 [59]. The comment was not accepted by PRL, but our contribution was acknowledged in the form of an erratum to the original paper published on the 18 th of August 2017 [60]. This erratum references our comment and thanks us for bringing the issues to their attention.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations