DOI: 10.3384/diss.diva-140912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking the Unbreakable: Exploiting Loopholes in Bell’s Theorem to Hack Quantum Cryptography

Abstract: Akademisk avhandlingsom för avläggande av doktorsexamen vid Linköpings Universitet kommer att offentligt försvaras i sal Ada Lovelace, hus B, universitetsområde Valla, fredagen den 17 november 2017 kl. 13:00. Fakultetsopponent är Professor Marek Zukowski, Instytut Fizyki Teoretycznej i Astrofizyki, Uniwersytet Gdański. AbstractIn this thesis we study device-independent quantum key distribution based on energy-time entanglement. This is a method for cryptography that promises not only perfect secrecy, but also … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, a separable quantum state cannot violate any Bell inequality when using lossy detectors and post-selection, if fair sampling holds. Similarly, under fair sampling it is impossible to violate the quantum bound of a Bell operator with post-selected statistics: in fact, the models and experiments showing that postselection can lead to incorrect conclusions [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] do not satisfy fair sampling. 4 The strong and homogeneous fair sampling assumptions Now we consider two special cases of fair sampling, which we call strong and homogeneous fair sampling.…”
Section: Proposition 2 (Probabilities Achievable Under Fair Sampling)...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, a separable quantum state cannot violate any Bell inequality when using lossy detectors and post-selection, if fair sampling holds. Similarly, under fair sampling it is impossible to violate the quantum bound of a Bell operator with post-selected statistics: in fact, the models and experiments showing that postselection can lead to incorrect conclusions [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] do not satisfy fair sampling. 4 The strong and homogeneous fair sampling assumptions Now we consider two special cases of fair sampling, which we call strong and homogeneous fair sampling.…”
Section: Proposition 2 (Probabilities Achievable Under Fair Sampling)...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erroneously deducing the non-locality of a local model [5,6,7]. Such canny local models are not abstract theoretical constructions, but have been produced experimentally with simple optical elements and detectors that are commonly used [8,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…non-quantum) platforms. 48,49,50 By presenting an alternative blockchain architecture, we hope to promote further investigation into issues and advantages of novel quantum-enabled blockchain protocols, 51,52,53,54,55,56 and more generally, offer insight into the process of mapping traditional scientific computing technologies onto newly emerging quantum technologies. 57,58,59,60,61,62…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%