2013
DOI: 10.26530/oapen_459945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

France in the South Pacific: Power and Politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…France's reasons for maintaining the territory were essentially geostrategic (Fisher 2013) and Paris counted on the support of part of the ethnic French population to democratically legitimise the existing relationship. However, forced by the domestic situation and under pressure from the United Nations, France accepted its obligations as an administering power, recognised the right to self-determination, and undertook a series of measures to resolve the conflict via a pact with local actors.…”
Section: New Caledonia and Its Postponed Self-determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…France's reasons for maintaining the territory were essentially geostrategic (Fisher 2013) and Paris counted on the support of part of the ethnic French population to democratically legitimise the existing relationship. However, forced by the domestic situation and under pressure from the United Nations, France accepted its obligations as an administering power, recognised the right to self-determination, and undertook a series of measures to resolve the conflict via a pact with local actors.…”
Section: New Caledonia and Its Postponed Self-determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others remain the possessions of the United States and France, maintained primarily for advancing strategic and military interests. These include the US territories of American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, and the French collectivities of French Polynesia, Wallis and Futuna and New Caledonia (Fisher, 2013; Shigematsu and Camacho, 2010). Though motivated less by strategic considerations, political sovereignty over Tokelau is also maintained by New Zealand.…”
Section: Ethnicity and Colonialism In Oceaniamentioning
confidence: 99%