2012
DOI: 10.1080/08164649.2012.648260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing the Victim

Abstract: This paper analyses the (re-)presentation of rape complainant testimony on three

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In producing our guidelines, we wanted to offer concrete advice on how to handle the very different weight of publicly-reportable information about the accused and complainers typical in all sexual assault trials, albeit exacerbated in cases involving public figures. This is something other feminist media critics have grappled with (Oldfield & McDonald, 2021;Waterhouse-Watson, 2012), and we appreciate the difficulties journalists face in reporting responsibly whilst still producing readable copy. We suggest that journalists try to ensure equal weight is given to accused and complainer across the reporting of the trial as a whole and do not give details about one party which cannot be given about the other (Boyle and Jessie, 2020).…”
Section: (Ir)responsible Reporting Of Sexual Assault Trialsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In producing our guidelines, we wanted to offer concrete advice on how to handle the very different weight of publicly-reportable information about the accused and complainers typical in all sexual assault trials, albeit exacerbated in cases involving public figures. This is something other feminist media critics have grappled with (Oldfield & McDonald, 2021;Waterhouse-Watson, 2012), and we appreciate the difficulties journalists face in reporting responsibly whilst still producing readable copy. We suggest that journalists try to ensure equal weight is given to accused and complainer across the reporting of the trial as a whole and do not give details about one party which cannot be given about the other (Boyle and Jessie, 2020).…”
Section: (Ir)responsible Reporting Of Sexual Assault Trialsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We do not want reporting to cast doubt on an acquittal, but rather -throughout the reporting of trial and verdict -we urge that both accused and complainer are granted a presumption of innocence. As it stands, trial reporting too often asserts the presumption of the accused's innocence at the expense of the complainer, so that for him to be presumed innocent, she must be assumed to have lied (Waterhouse-Watson, 2012). This reinforces the sense that many complainers report that they are the ones who are actually on trial.…”
Section: (Ir)responsible Reporting Of Sexual Assault Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%