Organic Farming, Prototype for Sustainable Agricultures 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7927-3_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing the Social, Ecological and Economic Goods and Services Derived from Organic Agriculture in the Canadian Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus adopted a broader view of the ecosystem service concept than in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) by extending the categories of "goods and services to consider the territorial vitality and by focusing on the interrelationships between livestock farming and society" (Zhang et al 2007). We thus adopted the categories of Social Environmental Economic Goods and Services (SEEGS) defined by Lynch et al (2014) and applied by Ryschawy et al (2015) to services provided by livestock farming to society: (i) provisioning services refer to the food products; (ii) environmental services consider the biophysical processes providing benefits, such as biodiversity maintenance, climate regulation, and water purification; (iii) cultural services are recreational, esthetic, and heritage benefits; and (iv) territorial vitality services refer to rural community vitality and employment. Our research is focused on the last two categories of services that have received little attention from research.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Services Provided By Livestockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus adopted a broader view of the ecosystem service concept than in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) by extending the categories of "goods and services to consider the territorial vitality and by focusing on the interrelationships between livestock farming and society" (Zhang et al 2007). We thus adopted the categories of Social Environmental Economic Goods and Services (SEEGS) defined by Lynch et al (2014) and applied by Ryschawy et al (2015) to services provided by livestock farming to society: (i) provisioning services refer to the food products; (ii) environmental services consider the biophysical processes providing benefits, such as biodiversity maintenance, climate regulation, and water purification; (iii) cultural services are recreational, esthetic, and heritage benefits; and (iv) territorial vitality services refer to rural community vitality and employment. Our research is focused on the last two categories of services that have received little attention from research.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Services Provided By Livestockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bolstered by the back-to-the-land movement in the 1960s, it grew in strength and numbers to include a wider range of movement players: chefs, restaurateurs, nutritionists, green entrepreneurs, farming associations, back-to-the-landers, disaffected conventional farmers, conservationists, environmentalists, academics, and co-operatives-all focused on organic food. Today, it has become an international movement dedicated not only to resisting the industrialization of food and agriculture but also to providing a model of alternative ways of eating and living, and to highlighting the social, ecological, and economic goods and services organic agriculture provides (Lynch, Sumner, & Martin, 2014). Today's organic movement has been critiqued on a range of issues, including gender bias (Sumner & Llewelyn, 2011), lack of commitment to social sustainability (Shreck, Getz, & Feenstra, 2006) and co-optation (Jaffee & Howard, 2009), but it continues to evolve and mature.…”
Section: Cultivating Alliances With Other Social Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this review focuses on agronomic intensification in organic farming, the concept of diversification as meaning cultivating socio-ecological complexity is key also to supporting organic farming's broader social and ecological goals in Canada and globally. To what degree is Canadian organic farming acting as a model of civil commons supporting social, economic and environmental services central to sustainability including resiliency to the threats of biodiversity loss, climate change and food insecurity (Lynch et al, 2014;Petersen-Rockney et al, 2021)? While data is limited, it is encouraging to see demographic trends for engagement in organic farming in Canada that are likely to influence multifunctional socio-ecological outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranfield et al (2010) found health and environmental concerns were a larger motivation than economic considerations driving conversion to organic farming in Canada. Also, in addition to advances in gender equality in farm ownership and management, the reliance on modes of knowledge production and sharing appear distinct in organic farming (Lynch et al, 2014). These demographic trends and expanded perspectives, and potential further broadening of inclusivity, will continue to cultivate the socio-ecological complexity of organic farming in Canada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%