Framing international news in China: An analysis of trans-edited news in Chinese newspapers

Abstract

<jats:p> This research explores the variations between Chinese party and non-party newspapers in the framing of trans-edited international news. Existing studies on the framing of Chinese domestic news show that the variations depend on the sensitivity of news, which invokes government control. However, it is not clear how strictly the government would control international news and whether party and non-party news organizations would show similarities or variations in the framing of it. To address these issues, we conducted a comparative quantitative content analysis of 806 pieces of trans-edited international news from one party newspaper and one non-party newspaper. The findings show that the party and non-party newspapers show similarity on the use of three frames but small variations on the other four. This implies a strong control of the Chinese government on the reporting of international news. By comparison, the government control has stronger effects on the party newspaper than on its non-party counterpart. </jats:p>

Attacking with Their Own Words: The Use of Censored Sources by the Party Media in China

“…In fact, the Chinese government has a long tradition of selectively paraphrasing foreign news to foster party propaganda (Rudolph 1984), and separately reporting foreign and domestic responses to public emergencies (Jin Li, Brewer, and Ley 2017). However, even though the party outlets are obligated to advance party ideologies, the media framing of trans-edited international news seems largely factual (Kuang and Wang 2020;Kuang and Wei 2018). This factual framing of the information, I argue, serves to cultivate a sense of professionality and objectivity, which increases the credibility of the party's stand on the issue.…”

Explaining Anti-Asian Xenophobia to Chinese Audience: Coverage of Hate Incidents During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the PRC Press

“…In reporting domestic issues, the Chinese press avoids themes threatening state legitimacy (e.g., responsibility or conflict frames). In contrast, in reporting international problems, it is acceptable to cover more controversial issues (Kuang and Wang 2020). It has also been demonstrated that Chinese elites use foreign news reporting to demonstrate other countries' flaws, highlight the PRC's relative advantages, and rebuff criticism of the Chinese government.…”

“…Although some Chinese media outlets are privately owned, the Central Propaganda Department of the CCP censors all Chinese media (Luo 2015). Commercial news organisations have more freedom than party-sponsored media and have room for manoeuvre when covering international news (Kuang and Wang 2020). Still, discourse on sensitive topics is monitored to construct and spread narratives approved by the CCP.…”

The China Daily’s framing of THAAD deployment: “A New Cold War in East Asia”

“…However, it cannot be denied that a limited number of journalists pursue professional journalism adopted by Western journalists (Wang & Lyu, 2022). Non-party newspapers are more likely to be receptive to the needs of the market than serving as the party's media mouthpieces (Kuang & Wang, 2020).…”