2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power

Abstract: This article proposes integrating the insights generated by framing, priming, and agenda-setting research through a systematic effort to conceptualize and understand their larger implications for political power and democracy. The organizing concept is bias, that curiously undertheorized staple of public discourse about the media. After showing how agenda setting, framing and priming fit together as tools of power, the article connects them to explicit definitions of news slant and the related but distinct phe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
637
0
80

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,081 publications
(779 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(12 reference statements)
9
637
0
80
Order By: Relevance
“…These packages of story encompass arguments, information, symbols, metaphors, and images (Gamson & Modigliani, 1987). In detail, utilizing framing strategies, mass media often pursues to dominate certain controversial issues into topics that are more easily intelligible and persuadable for the audience and has relevantly significant power to influence how audience understand, interpret, and react to the issues (Entman, 2007;Lee, Kim, & Love, 2014;Tewksbury & Scheufele, 2009;De Vreese, 2005). For example, if any topic is frequently and distinctly mentioned and covered in mass media, the audience possibly may understand the issues as more important way (Golan & Wanta, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Media Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These packages of story encompass arguments, information, symbols, metaphors, and images (Gamson & Modigliani, 1987). In detail, utilizing framing strategies, mass media often pursues to dominate certain controversial issues into topics that are more easily intelligible and persuadable for the audience and has relevantly significant power to influence how audience understand, interpret, and react to the issues (Entman, 2007;Lee, Kim, & Love, 2014;Tewksbury & Scheufele, 2009;De Vreese, 2005). For example, if any topic is frequently and distinctly mentioned and covered in mass media, the audience possibly may understand the issues as more important way (Golan & Wanta, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Media Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted however that one of the most pressing issues in framing research is the lack of conceptual clarity and operational definitions. But one can draw from Entman who suggests that to frame is to "select some aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient in a communicating context [7].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second-level agenda-setting theory suggests that changes in media emphasis on certain attributes of an issue relative to other attributes affect the relative importance of that issue as perceived by the public (Ghanem, 1996;Ghanem, 1997;Hester & Gibson, 2003). In this regard, secondlevel agenda-setting is similar, to varying degrees from author to author, to frame analysis and framing effects (McCombs & Ghanem, 2001;Coleman & Banning, 2006;Aday, 2006;Entman, 2007;Weaver, 2007), in that both frame analysis and second-level agenda-setting recognize that the attributes of an jpc.mcmaster.ca issue affect public cognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%