2006
DOI: 10.1080/01292980500118516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing Analysis of a Conflict: How Newspapers in Five Asian Countries Covered the Iraq War

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on the meso level, Hackett (1984) suggested that journalistic routines, strategies, and expectations affect media content, causing bias in the news. Maslog et al (2006) examined how news media from five Asian countries cover of the Iraq War to discover that religion plays an important role in shaping news content. Specifically, media from non-Muslim countries had stronger war journalism framing than those from Muslim nations.…”
Section: Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on the meso level, Hackett (1984) suggested that journalistic routines, strategies, and expectations affect media content, causing bias in the news. Maslog et al (2006) examined how news media from five Asian countries cover of the Iraq War to discover that religion plays an important role in shaping news content. Specifically, media from non-Muslim countries had stronger war journalism framing than those from Muslim nations.…”
Section: Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Reese and Buckalew (1995) interviewed news producers of an Austin, Texas ABC television affiliate and also investigated coverage of the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War by this station and discovered that this particular media entity framed the Persian Gulf War to develop and encourage support for United States military action in the Persian Gulf region. Similarly, Maslog, Lee, and Kim (2006) examined Asian newspapers coverage of the current Iraq War and found that these media outlets were overwhelmingly supportive of the American/British position. Yet in some instances, mass media organizations use framing to present groups in ways that counter stereotypes of the group (Miller & Ross, 2004).…”
Section: Media Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the literature on peace journalism has largely been qualitative and normative in nature (Galtung, 2004;Galtung et al, 2002;Hanitzsch, 2004Hanitzsch, , 2007Hanitzsch et al, 2004;Lynch, 2007Lynch, , 2008Lynch and Galtung, 2010;Lynch and McGoldrick, 2005;Ottosen, 2010;Pedelty, 1995), the body of quantitative work has been slowly increasing in recent years (Chung et al, 2007;Fahmy and Eakin, 2014;Fahmy and Neumann, 2012;Lance et al, 2011;Lee, 2010;Lee and Maslog, 2005;Lee et al, 2006;Maslog et al, 2006;Neumann and Fahmy, 2012;Shinar, 2009;Tanweer, 2012). Quantitative studies and empirical assessments have mainly focused on content analysis of news coverage.…”
Section: The Content Analysis Approach: Measuring Conflict Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the body of peace/ war scholarship has been increasing, the majority has been devoted to qualitative studies using interviews (e.g., Bla¨si, 2009;Broune´us, 2011), ethnographic approaches (e.g., Kosmatopoulos, 2014;Pedelty, 1995), and providing assessments and descriptions of guidelines with criteria of what constitutes peace journalism in contrast to war journalism (e.g., McGoldrick and Lynch, 2000). A small yet growing number of scholars have conducted some empirical research in recent years (see Chung et al, 2007;Fahmy and Eakin, 2014;Fahmy and Neumann, 2012;Greenwood and Jenkins, 2013;Lance et al, 2011;Lee, 2010;Lee and Maslog, 2005;Lee et al, 2006;Maslog et al, 2006;Neumann and Fahmy, 2012;Tanweer, 2012). These quantitative studies, well anchored in framing research, however, relied primarily on content analysis of (textual and visual) media coverage of conflicts using war/peace frames.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%