2020
DOI: 10.1080/24748706.2020.1762268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for Planning TMVR using 3-D Imaging, In Silico Modeling, and Virtual Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite recent generic reviews of visual computing solutions in cardiology applications[ 2 , 4 - 6 ], there is a lack of complete studies testing the different visualization methodologies on the same patient-specific data for benchmarking purposes. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first attempt on this direction focusing on LAAO interventions, aiming at evaluating the added value, limitations, and requirements for the clinical translation of these technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite recent generic reviews of visual computing solutions in cardiology applications[ 2 , 4 - 6 ], there is a lack of complete studies testing the different visualization methodologies on the same patient-specific data for benchmarking purposes. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first attempt on this direction focusing on LAAO interventions, aiming at evaluating the added value, limitations, and requirements for the clinical translation of these technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this juncture, there is a significant gap in understanding the 3D (plus time) anatomical and physiological relationships in the heart[ 3 ] that visual computing solutions can help to bridge. Recent studies have reviewed the added value of advanced visualization of cardiac data, including applications in conditions such as congenital heart disease[ 4 , 5 ], structural heart disease[ 2 ], or transcatheter mitral valve replacement[ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clinical translation of advanced visualisation technologies is not straightforward, fulfilling the demanding requirements to be embedded in the existing workflows in hospitals. Despite recent generic reviews of visual computing solutions in cardiology applications (e.g., Wang et al (2021); Salavitabar et al (2020); Goo et al (2020); Kohli et al (2020)), there is a lack of complete studies testing the different visualisation methodologies on the same patient-specific data for benchmarking purposes. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first attempt on this direction focused on LAAO interventions, aiming at evaluating the added value, limitations and requirements for the clinical translation of these technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this juncture, there is a significant gap in understanding the 3D (plus time) anatomical and physiological relationships in the heart Wang et al (2018a) that visual computing solutions can help to bridge. Recent studies have reviewed the added value of advanced visualisation of cardiac data, including in specific applications such as in congenital heart disease Salavitabar et al (2020); Goo et al (2020), in structural heart disease Wang et al (2021) or transcatheter mitral valve replacement Kohli et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data suggests that, in patients undergoing a valve-in-ring or valve-in-mitral annular calcification procedure, the anticipated risk of obstruction may in fact differ from the actual risk based on factors such as valve deployment depth (more atrial vs. more ventricular) or the valve deployment orientation (coaxial vs. canted with respect to the mitral valve). Personalized computational modeling may eventually help in better predicting the hemodynamic outcome of patients ( 13 ), and should account for a range of valve deployment scenarios. Recent interventional techniques have also enabled more predictable deployment of the transcatheter valve in the predicted landing zone, and may help improve future predictions of LVOT obstruction risk ( 14 , 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%