2007
DOI: 10.2172/1324301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for Integrating Safety, Operations, Security, and Safeguards in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Darby et al [36] provide a framework for integrating the disciplines of safety, operations, safeguard and security in the design and operation of nuclear facilities. This work references several of the approaches mentioned above, and provides a preliminary framework that begins at the facility design and extends to facility operation.…”
Section: Integrating Safeguards and Security For Nuclear Facility Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Darby et al [36] provide a framework for integrating the disciplines of safety, operations, safeguard and security in the design and operation of nuclear facilities. This work references several of the approaches mentioned above, and provides a preliminary framework that begins at the facility design and extends to facility operation.…”
Section: Integrating Safeguards and Security For Nuclear Facility Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the scale and scope, as well as the latest design trends in the next generation of nuclear facilities, there is an opportunity to evaluate the regulatory requirements and optimize the design process for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), as compared to current Light Water Reactors (LWRs).To this end, Sandia has embarked on an initiative to evaluate the interactions of regulations and operations as an approach to optimizing the design of SMR facilities, supporting operational efficiencies, as well as regulatory requirements. The early stages of this initiative consider two focus areas.The first focus area, reported by LaChance, et al (2007), identifies the regulatory requirements established for the current fleet of LWR facilities regarding Safety, Security, Operations, Safeguards, and Emergency Planning, and evaluates the technical bases for these requirements.The second focus area, developed in this report, documents the foundations for an innovative approach that supports a design framework for SMR facilities that incorporates the regulatory environment, as well as the continued operation of the facility, into the early design stages, eliminating the need for costly retrofitting and additional operating personnel to fulfill regulatory requirements. The work considers a technique known as Integrated Safety, Operations, Security and Safeguards (ISOSS) (Darby, et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early stages of this initiative consider two focus areas.The first focus area, reported by LaChance, et al (2007), identifies the regulatory requirements established for the current fleet of LWR facilities regarding Safety, Security, Operations, Safeguards, and Emergency Planning, and evaluates the technical bases for these requirements.The second focus area, developed in this report, documents the foundations for an innovative approach that supports a design framework for SMR facilities that incorporates the regulatory environment, as well as the continued operation of the facility, into the early design stages, eliminating the need for costly retrofitting and additional operating personnel to fulfill regulatory requirements. The work considers a technique known as Integrated Safety, Operations, Security and Safeguards (ISOSS) (Darby, et al, 2007). In coordination with the best practices of industrial operations, the goal of this effort is to develop a design framework that outlines how ISOSS requirements can be incorporated into the pre-conceptual through early facility design stages, seeking a cost-effective design that meets both operational efficiencies and the regulatory environment.The larger scope of the project, i.e., in future stages, includes the identification of potentially conflicting requirements identified by the ISOSS framework, including an analysis of how regulatory requirements may be changed to account for the intrinsic features of SMRs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations