2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30278-8_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framework for Assessing the Smartness Maturity Level of Villages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several architectural solutions in the literature cover non-functional requirements such as interoperability (e.g., a broker [20]), as well as security and privacy requirements (e.g., data encryption [20]), such as access control and data privacy [21], balancing between them is not a trivial task as off-the-shelf solutions do not exist [22]. Architectural solutions include trade-offs that can facilitate interoperable access between applications, but that could introduce a lot of distrust between parties [23], [24], [25], [26].…”
Section: A Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several architectural solutions in the literature cover non-functional requirements such as interoperability (e.g., a broker [20]), as well as security and privacy requirements (e.g., data encryption [20]), such as access control and data privacy [21], balancing between them is not a trivial task as off-the-shelf solutions do not exist [22]. Architectural solutions include trade-offs that can facilitate interoperable access between applications, but that could introduce a lot of distrust between parties [23], [24], [25], [26].…”
Section: A Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical results indicate that the proposed methodology presents a feasible strategy that can function across diverse domains. [63] developed an initial iteration of an intelligent assessment system that allows individuals residing in rural communities to self-evaluate their current status according to the smartness criteria established by a global community of experts. The system utilizes the Electre Tri multi-criteria analysis to enable a comprehensive evaluation of six distinct dimensions, namely mobility, governance, economics, environment, livelihoods, and people, through the application of criteria assessment.…”
Section: Prevent Inaccuraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the EU, various tools have been developed; to name a few: Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) is most widely used, but it does not provide specific data, especially for evaluation of the degree of digitalization in rural areas. To address DESI's shortcomings, within the Interreg Alpine Space SMART Villages project, a six-dimensional method to quantify the level of Smartness of cities and urban areas has been developed [31]. The Interreg Europe CARPE DIGEM project has designed a tool that allows stakeholders to establish the digital maturity of territories, including peripheral and emerging territories, to (further) develop and improve their digital transformation strategies [32].…”
Section: Rural Digital Innovation Hubs As a Central And Fundamental S...mentioning
confidence: 99%