Framework Conditions and Strategies for Pop-Up Environments in Urban Planning

Abstract

Urban strategies and the way cities are planned have changed throughout history, adapting to the needs of the inhabitants, infrastructure requirements, and advances in technology. Uses and customs of people and cities are changing and can evolve much faster than in the past, with the result that urban planning is often too slow to adequately meet the current needs of society. In this context, the development of pop-up environments for temporary developments could be a solution to meet the needs of flexibility, adaptation, and resilience of a city. This allows the urban planner to consider systems from a short-term perspective, fulfilling current needs without compromising the development of potentially different activities in the future. The purpose of this research work is to outline the general requirements of pop-up environments in urban developments that allow for adequate integration into urban planning strategies. Based on an extensive evaluation of the existing literature and a series of case studies, the paper analyzes the key elements that define the framework conditions of urban planning strategies for temporary developments that generate a positive impact on the overall urban system.

Transferring COVID-19 Challenges into Learning Potentials: Online Workshops in Architectural Education

“…Keeping in mind that the role of architecture is to think, design, and manage the built environment in a way that will satisfy the needs of future humanity, the connection between architecture and sustainability is unequivocally important. On this basis, several perspectives on the interrelation of architecture and sustainability have been challenged, including integration of social factors, culture, and technology with architecture [15], providing flexibility to adapt to local habits and needs through sustainable design which can be replicated by the local community [16], and developing pop-up environments through temporary architecture [17]. Several concepts have been developed to link design and socially environmental changes, hence, strengthen the sustainable dimension of architecture through socially responsible design [18], design for social change [19], environmentally conscious design [20], and-currently the most important from the pandemic perspective-emergency design and humanitarian architecture [21].…”

The Obverse/Reverse Pavilion: An Example of Form-Finding With Isogeometric Analysis in the Design of Temporary, Low-Cost and Eco-Friendly Structure

“…The popularity of pop-up structures arises from the fact that the urban fabric had been fulfilled with the permanent structures, while the temporary nature gives an opportunity for testing unconventional solutions and experimenting in a public space with limited financial and legislative issues. They are structures or spaces that are built fast and are intended for temporary use which fulfil users' functional and aesthetical needs [8].…”

Spatial Transformation of a New City in 2006–2020: Perspectives on the Spatial Dynamics, Environmental Quality Degradation, and Socio—Economic Sustainability of Local Communities in Makassar City, Indonesia

“…Three types of spatial expressions that can be constructed are related to lifestyle changes in the new city area of Metro Tanjung Bunga: (i) Social levels, (b) urbanization, and (3) segregation. Thus, a consolidated urban-rural land market and a better land market mechanism must be established, the supply of public goods and services for villagers must be increased further, and the monitoring and evaluation mechanisms must be further strengthened [80].…”