2006
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000232770.97616.d0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frameless Stereotactic Cannulation Of The Foramen Ovale For Ablative Treatment Of Trigeminal Neuralgia

Abstract: Based on the noninvasive Vogele-Bale-Hohner vacuum mouthpiece, there is no need for invasive head clamp fixation. Imaging, real laboratory simulation, and the actual surgical intervention can be separated in time and location. The presented data suggest that frameless stereotaxy is a predictable and reproducible procedure, which may enhance patient security and cannulation success independent of the surgeon's experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A biplane imaging unit could be used instead of a portable monoplane unit to successfully enter the cave. Frameless stereotaxy using a navigating system is helpful for cannulation of the foramen ovale 2) . The catheter may have to be repositioned one or more times until the characteristic pear shape appears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A biplane imaging unit could be used instead of a portable monoplane unit to successfully enter the cave. Frameless stereotaxy using a navigating system is helpful for cannulation of the foramen ovale 2) . The catheter may have to be repositioned one or more times until the characteristic pear shape appears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the more distant targets yielded slightly larger values, confirming the significant impact of the distance between the registration and target points on the accuracy [7,8,21], even the maximum deviation of 1.2 mm is still within the range (1 to 2 mm) that is often considered ''clinically acceptable'' for navigation system accuracy [1,21,25,26]. Maxillary splint-based systems with extraoral extensions for reference markers have been used previously with sufficient navigational accuracy in neurosurgery (0.29-0.86 mm [17], 0.0-2.0 mm [27]), in sinus surgery (1.56 AE 0.76 mm [28]), and in the temporal region (0.73 AE 0.25 mm [17,29]); however, only a few of these systems have been tested for targets in the lateral skull base region [15,29,30,31]. Bale et al used a mouthpiecebased registration template held in place by a vacuum system to successfully cannulate the foramen ovale [30], but did not test its applicability for Figure 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maxillary splint-based systems with extraoral extensions for reference markers have been used previously with sufficient navigational accuracy in neurosurgery (0.29-0.86 mm [17], 0.0-2.0 mm [27]), in sinus surgery (1.56 AE 0.76 mm [28]), and in the temporal region (0.73 AE 0.25 mm [17,29]); however, only a few of these systems have been tested for targets in the lateral skull base region [15,29,30,31]. Bale et al used a mouthpiecebased registration template held in place by a vacuum system to successfully cannulate the foramen ovale [30], but did not test its applicability for Figure 3. Navigational screenshot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical navigation systems have recently been adapted to improve trajectory planning and targeting [2][3][4][5]. Navigation systems allow real-time tracking of surgical instruments projected in the patient's corresponding CT or MR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%