Image guided surgery of the lateral skull base: Testing a new dental splint registration device

Abstract

Objective: The widespread use of image guided surgery in the frontolateral skull base region has been limited by the need for a reliable and non-invasive registration procedure that provides sub-millimetric accuracy. We developed and validated preclinically a non-invasive, easy-to-use registration device based on a dental splint with a laterally mounted fiducial carrier. Methods: Repeated accuracy measurements were performed on six titanium target fiducials which were screwed into the lateral skull base region of a cadaver head and could be unequivocally identified both on the CT image and in reality. The system accuracy was evaluated by determining the deviation of the real target position from the position indicated in the CT scan. The accuracy of the dental splint-based registration was compared to that of two standard registration procedures: contour-based laser surface registration and fixed marker registration. Results: The mean accuracy of 0.55 AE 0.28 mm obtained when using the maxillary splint device was similar to that obtained with the ''gold standard'' registration using bone-implanted markers (0.33 AE 0.26 mm), while being clearly superior to that obtained with contour-based laser surface registration (1.91 AE 0.74 mm). Conclusions: Registration using the non-invasively fixed maxillary fiducial platform can provide sub-millimetric accuracy in the lateral skull base region. In vivo validation may prove dental splint-based registration to be an accurate and non-invasive alternative option for image guided surgery of the lateral skull base, and may facilitate the application of navigation systems in this delicate region.

A new markerless patient‐to‐image registration method using a portable 3D scanner

“…The quality of the patient-to-image registration process directly affects the application accuracy of IGNS, and the accuracy of the patient-to-image registration significantly depends on the registration method used. [1][2][3] Patient-to-image registration is achieved by matching corresponding structures in the two spaces, and two types of noninvasive patient-to-image registration methods are currently available in IGNS: point-matching and surfacematching. The first is more widely used in practice.…”

Registration using 3D-printed rigid templates outperforms manually scanned surface matching in image-guided temporal bone surgery

“…An autoregistration device using a malleable adhesive mask with LED markers for the face [24,25] is another noninvasive method that shares a similar theoretical background with the S-STAMP method. Template-based registration using the upper dentition can be applied with minimal invasiveness and serviceable accuracy at the paranasal sinus [26]; however, this registration method did not provide satisfactory accuracy at the lateral skull base [16,27]. The problem lies in the distance from the upper teeth (registration centroid) to the temporal bone, resulting in a larger error [28].…”

“…First, we did not average the TREs of different measurement points, as often described in the previous literature [15,16]. This is because we have learned that the TRE is not randomly scattered, but rather a value that is dependent on the distance from the registration centroid.…”

Accuracy of surface registration in cranial electromagnetic navigation

“…70% higher TRE (1.59 ± 0.14 mm), and registration of anatomic landmarks resulted in an up to 346% higher mean TRE (4.2 ± 0.73). Ledderose et al [25] observed a mean TRE of 0.33 mm for registration with bone anchored fiducials, whereas surface registration resulted in a higher mean TRE of 1.9 mm. (approx.…”