2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a NexGen posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the orthopaedic literature is mixed regarding the wear-related effects of cruciate retention versus substitution [10,12,17,23,27,31,33,34,47,49], two studies identified osteolysis and wear problems associated with a posterior stabilized design [15,37]. In addition to shape, the properties of the polyethylene constitute one of the critical variables affecting wear of the tibial insert.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the orthopaedic literature is mixed regarding the wear-related effects of cruciate retention versus substitution [10,12,17,23,27,31,33,34,47,49], two studies identified osteolysis and wear problems associated with a posterior stabilized design [15,37]. In addition to shape, the properties of the polyethylene constitute one of the critical variables affecting wear of the tibial insert.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Post-irradiation melting leads to a decrease in the crystallinity of the polymer; further decreasing the fatigue strength of irradiated UHMWPE [6]. Fatigue failure of UHMWPE components has been a rare occurrence mostly due to severe oxidation [7,8]. Nevertheless, fatigue damage, especially in components under high cyclic stresses, is a major problem after wear, limiting the longevity of joint implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients were treated by revision using a deep-dish congruent tibial liner, with a mean followup of 28 months (range, 13-61 months). There were eight different posteriorstabilized prostheses in the 27 other cases of tibial post fractures: 11 Insall-Burstein II1 [9,14,15,20,28], one Insall-Burstein I1 [14], three NexGen1 (all Zimmer) [8,11,23], four Scorpio1 (Stryker, Mahwah NJ, USA) [17,18,25], four Genesis1 (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) [19,26,30], two PFC-Sigma1 [3,32], one AMK (both DePuy, Warsaw IN, USA) [29], and one DualArticular1 [5] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%