The larger structures are, the lower their mechanical strength. Already discussed by Leonardo da Vinci and Edmé Mariotte several centuries ago, size effects on strength remain of crucial importance in modern engineering for the elaboration of safety regulations in structural design or the extrapolation of laboratory results to geophysical field scales. Under tensile loading, statistical size effects are traditionally modeled with a weakest-link approach. One of its prominent results is a prediction of vanishing strength at large scales that can be quantified in the framework of extreme value statistics. Despite a frequent use outside its range of validity, this approach remains the dominant tool in the field of statistical size effects. Here we focus on compressive failure, which concerns a wide range of geophysical and geotechnical situations. We show on historical and recent experimental data that weakest-link predictions are not obeyed. In particular, the mechanical strength saturates at a nonzero value toward large scales. Accounting explicitly for the elastic interactions between defects during the damage process, we build a formal analogy of compressive failure with the depinning transition of an elastic manifold. This critical transition interpretation naturally entails finite-size scaling laws for the mean strength and its associated variability. Theoretical predictions are in remarkable agreement with measurements reported for various materials such as rocks, ice, coal, or concrete. This formalism, which can also be extended to the flowing instability of granular media under multiaxial compression, has important practical consequences for future design rules.O wing to its importance for structural design (1), the elaboration of safety regulations (2), or the extrapolation of laboratory results to geophysical field scales (3), the size effects on strength of materials are one of the oldest problems in engineering, already discussed by Leonardo da Vinci and Edmé Mariotte (4) several centuries ago, but still an active field of research (5, 6). As early as 1686, Mariotte (4) qualitatively introduced the weakestlink concept to account for size effects on mechanical strength, a phenomenon evidenced by Leonardo da Vinci almost two centuries earlier. This idea, which states that the larger the system considered is, the larger the probability to find a particularly faulty place that will be at the origin of global failure, was formalized much later by Weibull (7). Considering a chain of elementary independent links, the failure of the chain is obtained as soon as one link happens to break. By virtue of the independence between the potential breaking events, the survival probability of a chain of N links is obtained by the simple multiplication of the N elementary probabilities. Depending on the properties of the latter, the global survival probability converges toward one of the three limit distributions identified by Weibull (7), Gumbel (8), and Fréchet (8), respectively. Together with Fisher and Tippett (9), t...