1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1740-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…He argued that when the solutions given in [9] are converted to use polar coordinates, the resulting stress is a function of a stress intensity factor (SIF) and a series of trigonometric functions. By equating the work done to open the crack to the strain energy release rate, Irwin demonstrated the equivalence of the SERR and the SIF, which is now usually written as [10,11]:…”
Section: Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He argued that when the solutions given in [9] are converted to use polar coordinates, the resulting stress is a function of a stress intensity factor (SIF) and a series of trigonometric functions. By equating the work done to open the crack to the strain energy release rate, Irwin demonstrated the equivalence of the SERR and the SIF, which is now usually written as [10,11]:…”
Section: Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of plane stress E = E, and for plane strain E = E/ 1 − ν 2 [10], where E is Young's modulus and ν is Poisson's ratio. Note that strictly speaking this equation only holds if K a = K a+∆a , i.e.…”
Section: Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional approaches given in popular textbooks (Anderson, 1995;Miannay, 1998) present the stress fields ahead of a crack tip as a combination of three modes, while the majority of the analytical or numerical studies deal only with two-dimensional problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Weibull statistics, the mean strength σ f and the associated SD δ(σ f ) then scale with sample size L as σ f ðLÞ ∼ δðσ f ÞðLÞ ∼ L −d=m . This approach has been successfully applied to the statistics of brittle failure strength under tension (7,13), with m in the range 6-30 (14). It implies a vanishing strength for L → +∞, although this decrease can be rather shallow, owing to the large values of m often reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%