2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture characterization and fluid flow simulation with geomechanical constraints for a CO2–EOR and sequestration project Teapot Dome Oil Field, Wyoming, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the Mountaineer project, West Virginia (Lucier et al 2006), the Teapot Dome Pilot Field, Wyoming (Chiaramonte et al 2008(Chiaramonte et al , 2011b, the Dogger Carbonates of the Paris Basin (Vidal-Gilbert et al 2009), a petroleum onshore field, Brazil (Mendes et al 2010), the In Salah CO 2 storage project, Algeria (Rutqvist et al 2010;Bissell et al 2011;Morris et al 2011a, b: Baroni et al 2011Fokker et al 2011), the Po River plain, Northern Italy (Ferronato et al 2010), an offshore gas field in the Dutch sector of the North Sea (Orlic et al 2011), Snøhvit, Barents Sea (Chiaramonte et al 2011a); Otway, Australia (Vidal-Gilbert et al 2010), and Ketzin, Germany (Ouellet et al 2011). The majority of these analyses show that CO 2 injection may induce fault reactivation depending on the applied injection pressure, but there are great uncertainties in the in situ stress field as well as in the assumed strength of fault properties.…”
Section: Potential Fault Reactivation and Notable Seismic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the Mountaineer project, West Virginia (Lucier et al 2006), the Teapot Dome Pilot Field, Wyoming (Chiaramonte et al 2008(Chiaramonte et al , 2011b, the Dogger Carbonates of the Paris Basin (Vidal-Gilbert et al 2009), a petroleum onshore field, Brazil (Mendes et al 2010), the In Salah CO 2 storage project, Algeria (Rutqvist et al 2010;Bissell et al 2011;Morris et al 2011a, b: Baroni et al 2011Fokker et al 2011), the Po River plain, Northern Italy (Ferronato et al 2010), an offshore gas field in the Dutch sector of the North Sea (Orlic et al 2011), Snøhvit, Barents Sea (Chiaramonte et al 2011a); Otway, Australia (Vidal-Gilbert et al 2010), and Ketzin, Germany (Ouellet et al 2011). The majority of these analyses show that CO 2 injection may induce fault reactivation depending on the applied injection pressure, but there are great uncertainties in the in situ stress field as well as in the assumed strength of fault properties.…”
Section: Potential Fault Reactivation and Notable Seismic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among options for CO2 storage, geological CO2 storage is widely accepted as the most viable option for large-scale storage (Leung et al, 2014). In the geological storage scheme, CO2 can be injected into saline aquifers, oil and gas reservoirs, or deep coal beds (Klusman, 2003;White et al, 2003;Fujioka et al, 2010;Garcia et al, 2010;Chiaramonte et al, 2011). The injected CO2 then can be trapped under the ground via a sequence of trapping mechanisms such as stratigraphic, residual, solubility, and mineral trapping (Smit et al, 2014b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state of stress in the reservoir is a function of changes in the pore pressure during production or injection phases (Cook et al, 2007). During injection, the reservoir pressure buildup changes the state of in-situ stresses (Alonso et al, 2012;Chiaramonte et al, 2011;Kim and Hosseini, 2014;Rutqvist et al, 2008), causing an increase in the bulk volume, pore compressibility, pore volume and storage capacity (Vulin et al, 2012). These stresses, especially the magnitudes of maximum and minimum horizontal stresses govern the leakage pressure from the reservoir (Lynch et al, 2013;Rutqvist et al, 2008) and vary significantly in a gas storage operation (Cook et al, 2007).…”
Section: Geomechanical Effects Related To Co2 Injection 1stress Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%