2000
DOI: 10.4327/jsnfs.53.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionation of Wild Rice (Zizania palustris) Polysaccharides and Characterization of the Starch Fraction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical Properties. It was more difficult to isolate starch from wild rice kernels than from milled rice kernels probably because of the inherent thick cell wall in wild rice kernels (8). This resulted in only 30-35% of starch yield for the wild rice, as compared with more than 70% for the milled rice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Physical Properties. It was more difficult to isolate starch from wild rice kernels than from milled rice kernels probably because of the inherent thick cell wall in wild rice kernels (8). This resulted in only 30-35% of starch yield for the wild rice, as compared with more than 70% for the milled rice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wild rice starches had a smaller proportion of DP 18-21 than the rice starch and therefore would have more defects in the crystallites than rice starch. Tahara et al (8) reported that the amylopectin of wild rice starch had a large proportion of DP 10-14 with a resolution up to DP 32. However, their results indicated that the amylopectin of wild rice starches had a lower proportion of DP 5-9 than that of rice starch, which was inconsistent with the present results, possibly because of sample variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation