2011 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs 2011
DOI: 10.1109/reconfig.2011.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FPGA Implementations of Radix-10 Digit Recurrence Fixed-Point and Floating-Point Dividers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [90], M. Baesler, S.O. Voigt, and T. Teufel presented the implementation data for shift and subtract algorithm, digit recurrence algorithm with signed redundant quotient, and carry-save representation.…”
Section: Implementation Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [90], M. Baesler, S.O. Voigt, and T. Teufel presented the implementation data for shift and subtract algorithm, digit recurrence algorithm with signed redundant quotient, and carry-save representation.…”
Section: Implementation Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works are going on to provide different standpoints for high-radix dividers. Use of different look-up tables along with quotient-digit selection logic look-up table [39][40][41], speculating quotient digit and using arithmetic functions to multiplicative iterations rather than subtractive iterations [42], pre-scaling operands [43][44][45], using Fourier division [46,47], using alternative digit codes such as binary-coded decimal (BCD) digits instead of decimal and basic binary digits [48], cascading multiple stages of lower radix dividers [49], overlapping two or more stages of low radix [50,51], a truncated schema of exact cell binary shifted adder array [52][53][54], on-line serial and pipelined operand division [55], parallel implementation of the low-radix dividers [8], array implementation [56], these are some of the possible ways applicable for high-radix dividers.…”
Section: Predict-correct Algorithm For Divisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The architectures of the type1, type2, and type4 dividers have already been published in [1]. However, this paper gives a more detailed description of the previous research and introduces two new dividers, which fill the design gap between the type1 and type2 dividers because they are based on two extreme examples of algorithms: the type1 divider implements a restoring quotient digit selection (QDS) function that requires nine decimal carry-propagate adders (CPAs) of full precision, whereas the nonrestoring QDS function of the type2 divider is implemented fully by means of a ROM with limited precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%