1992
DOI: 10.1080/0034408920870108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fowler's Theory of Faith Development: An Evaluative Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the theory has generated lively critical scholarly response from psychologists and theologians (e.g., Coyle 2011;Heywood 2008;McDargh 2001), it represented a major breakthrough in the integration of religion and psychology (Jardine and Viljoen 1992). In bringing together important features of several developmental models, namely those of Piaget (1967), Erikson (1950), Kohlberg (1981) and Selman (1976), Fowler has situated faith development squarely within the domain of human developmental processes, in the same way that Gladwin et al (1995) have situated the management of sustainable development as a process of achieving human development.…”
Section: Phases Of Faith Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the theory has generated lively critical scholarly response from psychologists and theologians (e.g., Coyle 2011;Heywood 2008;McDargh 2001), it represented a major breakthrough in the integration of religion and psychology (Jardine and Viljoen 1992). In bringing together important features of several developmental models, namely those of Piaget (1967), Erikson (1950), Kohlberg (1981) and Selman (1976), Fowler has situated faith development squarely within the domain of human developmental processes, in the same way that Gladwin et al (1995) have situated the management of sustainable development as a process of achieving human development.…”
Section: Phases Of Faith Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a brief sketch is offered here. It also is not the purpose of this article to address the myriad of questions concerning the adequacy of Fowler's theory (e.g., Broughton, 1986;Day, 200l;Jardin & Viljoen, 1992;McBride, 1976;Nelson & Aleshire, 1986;Parks 1991;Streib, 2001Streib, , 2005. Those interested in the ongoing debate about Fowler's way of conceptualizing faith should consult the collections in Dykstra and Parks (1986), Astley and Francis (1992), and a recent issue of the International Journal for the Psychology of Religion (Streib, 2001).…”
Section: Fowler's Theory Of Faith Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its attempts to attend to affective and relational dimensions of faith, the nature of the FDI is better attuned to uncovering the cognitive dimensions of faith, perhaps because the FDI attempts to cover these latter structures via reflections (cf. Broughton, 1986: Fernhout, 1986Jardin & Viljoen, 1992). The heavy focus of the current scoring guide on the structural elements of faith also tends to favor the cognitive elements of faith development for stage determination.…”
Section: Structures Of Faithmentioning
confidence: 99%