2020
DOI: 10.1504/ijmri.2020.111797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four years of structural health monitoring of the San Pietro bell tower in Perugia, Italy: two years before the earthquake versus two years after

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adopted OMA technique includes the following main steps: (i) continuous vibration data acquisition, (ii) run of SSI (CVA formulation) data analysis, considering the model's order varying from 40 to 60 (with step increments of 2) and the number of output block rows of Hankel matrix ranging from 140 to 200 (with step increments of 10), (iii) noise modes elimination through reasonable relative rejection thresholds between modal parameter estimates (0.01, 0.03 and 0.01 for relative changes in frequencies, in modal damping ratios and differences between MAC values, respectively), (iv) clustering analysis of remaining modes and, finally, (v) extraction of mean values of modal parameter estimates with 95% confidence intervals. Investigation of seasonal and daily fluctuations of identified modal parameters, associated with changes in environmental conditions (primarily in ambient temperature), can be found in (Ubertini et al 2017;Giordano et al 2020b).…”
Section: Description Of the Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted OMA technique includes the following main steps: (i) continuous vibration data acquisition, (ii) run of SSI (CVA formulation) data analysis, considering the model's order varying from 40 to 60 (with step increments of 2) and the number of output block rows of Hankel matrix ranging from 140 to 200 (with step increments of 10), (iii) noise modes elimination through reasonable relative rejection thresholds between modal parameter estimates (0.01, 0.03 and 0.01 for relative changes in frequencies, in modal damping ratios and differences between MAC values, respectively), (iv) clustering analysis of remaining modes and, finally, (v) extraction of mean values of modal parameter estimates with 95% confidence intervals. Investigation of seasonal and daily fluctuations of identified modal parameters, associated with changes in environmental conditions (primarily in ambient temperature), can be found in (Ubertini et al 2017;Giordano et al 2020b).…”
Section: Description Of the Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been explained as an effect of the superficial cracks and discontinuities that close due to the thermal expansion of the material. Still, for very low temperatures, the frequencies increase inversely due to the closure of the cracks induced by the freezing of the system [28,29,[42][43][44]. This phenomenon in some cases starts for temperature above 0 • C, determining either a non-linear correlation or a bilinear correlation with a knee.…”
Section: Interpreting the Variability Of The Structural Response To Support Damage Detection 21 Effects Of Eovs On Vibration Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon in some cases starts for temperature above 0 • C, determining either a non-linear correlation or a bilinear correlation with a knee. Other local phenomena can reduce the structural stiffness, and in turn the frequencies, with increasing temperature, including a progressive out of plumb or the slackening of ties [42,44,45]. A few studies also investigated the effect of relative humidity and wind speed on the structural behaviour.…”
Section: Interpreting the Variability Of The Structural Response To Support Damage Detection 21 Effects Of Eovs On Vibration Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology proposed in this paper combines OMA, SM and IDA for earthquakeinduced damage identification in historic masonry towers. It is applied to the San Pietro bell tower, an iconic Cultural Heritage masonry building that was hit by the three main shocks of the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence: (i) Accumoli Mw6.0 earthquake of August 24 th and the following shocks, (ii) Ussita Mw5.9 earthquake of October 26 th and (iii) Norcia Mw6.5 of October 30 th [4,23,24]. Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%