Four ways five factors are basic

Costa, Paul T.; McCrae, Robert R.

doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-i

Cited by 2,680 publications

(2,005 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,754

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The theoretical rationale for this finding is that personality traits influence prosocial behavior indirectly, through the acquisition of prosocial knowledge (Campbell, McCloy, Oppler, & Sager, 1993;Motowidlo et al, 2006). As distal antecedents of prosocial behavior, the influence of basic traits (Costa & McCrae, 1992) is mediated by beliefs about the effectiveness of that behavior. The studies reported here aim to replicate these findings in regard to personality traits and extend this prior work by also exploring the role of emotional intelligence (EI) as an antecedent of prosocial knowledge and behavior.…”

Section: Assessment Of Knowledge About Prosocial Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Prosocial knowledge mediates effects of agreeableness and emotional intelligence on prosocial behavior

Martín‐Raugh

Kell

Motowidlo

2016

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Assessment Of Knowledge About Prosocial Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Prosocial knowledge mediates effects of agreeableness and emotional intelligence on prosocial behavior

Martín‐Raugh

Kell

Motowidlo

2016

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Personality traits describe what people do and prefer (Costa & McCrae, 1992), but do not address the connection between current dispositional tendencies and individual motivation and behavior. FTP thus explains why conscientious individuals perform better, or why agreeable individuals have higher well-being.…”

Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Second, we advanced the theoretical development of FTP by proposing an integrative, motivationally-based framework and describing underlying processes that explain the relationships between general individual differences, FTP, and outcomes. Our results provide process explanations of the relationships between traits, motivation, and behavior by demonstrating that FTP mediates the relationships between traits and important outcomes.Personality traits describe what people do and prefer (Costa & McCrae, 1992), but do not address the connection between current dispositional tendencies and individual motivation and behavior. FTP thus explains why conscientious individuals perform better, or why agreeable individuals have higher well-being.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kooij¹,

Kanfer²,

Betts³

et al. 2018

Journal of Applied Psychology

337

310

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Future time perspectiveKooij, Dorien; Kanfer, R.; Betts, M.; Rudolph, C.W. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research -You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain -You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. The ability to foresee, anticipate, and plan for future desired outcomes is crucial for wellbeing, motivation, and behavior. However, theories in organizational psychology do not incorporate time-related constructs such as Future Time Perspective (FTP), and research on FTP remains disjointed and scattered, with different domains focusing on different aspects of the construct, using different measures, and assessing different antecedents and consequences. In this review and meta-analysis, we aim to clarify the FTP construct, advance its theoretical development, and demonstrate its importance by: (a) integrating theory and empirical findings across different domains of research in order to identify major outcomes and antecedents of FTP, and (b) empirically examining whether and how these variables are moderated by FTP measures and dimensions. Results of a meta-analysis of k = 212 studies reveal significant relationships between FTP and major classes of consequences (i.e., those related to achievement, well-being, health behavior, risk behavior, and retirement planning), and between antecedents and FTP, as well as moderating effects of different FTP measures and dimensions. Highlighting the importance of FTP for organizational psychology theories, our findings demonstrate that FTP predicts these outcomes over-and-above the big five personality traits and mediates the associations between these personality traits and outcomes.Keywords: future time perspective; integrative review; meta-analysis; nomological network FUTURE TIME PERSPECTIVE META-ANALYSIS 3 Future Time Perspective: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis "We all have our time machines. Some take us back, they're called memories.Some take us forward, they're called dreams." (Irons, 1948).Time surrounds and embeds all human behavior (McGrath & Kelly, 1992). Time provides individuals with a benchmark for orienting the self in the midst of myriad ongoing activities in work and non-work life roles, such as learning, task performance, and parenting.Time also provides individuals with a point of reference (Mohammed & Nadkarni, 2011;Ringle & Savickas, 1983) and a salient metric by which to organize, construct, re...

show abstract

“…As the study of personality evolved, the five-factor model (FFM) has come to be considered one of the most frequent representations of personality trait structure (Costa & McCrae, 1992a;McCrae & Costa, 1997;McCrae & John, 1992). The five factors are neuroticism (anxious, worried, insecure and emotionally unstable), extraversion (talkative, sociable, cheerful and active), openness (curious, imaginative, insightful, original, and broad-minded), agreeableness (altruistic, caring, kind, supportive and sympathetic) and conscientiousness (careful, thorough, responsible, organized, and self-disciplined).…”

Section: The Big Five Personality Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between Kolb's experiential learning styles and Big Five personality traits in international managers

Armstrong

2015

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the relationship between learning style and personality in international managers. Two-hundred-and-sixty-nine managers completed the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (KLSI 3.1). Regression analyses revealed that extraverted managers: have a preference for grasping new experience by engaging in concrete experience rather than abstract conceptualization; prefer to transform experience via active experimentation rather than reflective observation; and tend to have an accommodative learning style. It was concluded that whilst Kolb's experiential learning style construct is associated with personality, it is also distinct from personality.

show abstract

Four ways five factors are basic

Cited by 2,680 publications

References 57 publications

Prosocial knowledge mediates effects of agreeableness and emotional intelligence on prosocial behavior

Prosocial knowledge mediates effects of agreeableness and emotional intelligence on prosocial behavior

Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The relationship between Kolb's experiential learning styles and Big Five personality traits in international managers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About