Protoplasts were prepared from Streptococcus sanguis and some S. mutans serotypes by use of lysozyme (EC 3.2.1.17) under particular conditions: cells had to be grown in DL-threonine (20 mM) and harvested in early exponential phase. The efficiency of protoplast formation was enhanced by two additional steps: plasmolysis (in 12% PEG), prior to addition of lysozyme, and a swirling phase, after the enzymic action. This procedure allowed us to obtain clean protoplasts, with only 0.5 % contamination by bacterial cell walls. Up to 90% protoplast lysis was obtained in 0.5 M-NaCl. Cytoplasmic membrane purification was achieved by centrifugation on a glycerol cushion.
INTRODUCTIONStreptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus mutans are commonly associated with dental caries (Guggenheim, 1968). The latter species appears to be very heterogeneous, and has been divided into five biotypes (Shklair & Keene, 1976), four genetic groups (Coykendall, 1974) and eight (a to h) serological groups (Bratthall, 1970;Perch et al., 1974; Beighton et al., 198 1). Since purified serotype antigens were proposed as possible vaccines against dental caries (Taubman, 1973) much attention has been given to those characterized as wall-associated polysaccharides containing, in some cases, lipoteichoic acid (Silvestri et al., 1978;Vaught & Bleiweis, 1974). Because of the poor cross-reactivity between the different serotypes, more recent studies have dealt with the characterization of extracellular or wall-associated proteins (Russell & Lehner, 1978;Russell, 1979;Scholler et al., 1981). The difficulty in obtaining pure plasma membranes, free of cell wall components, from S. mutans and S. sanguis stems from the lack of efficient methods of protoplast preparation. Hence their cytoplasmic membranes are poorly characterized. Spheroplast induction with phage-associated lysins has been described for streptococci of Lancefield groups A, C, D and H (Krause, 1972;Bleiweis & Zimmermann, 1961 ;Calandra et al., 1975), but not for oral streptococci. Except for those belonging to Lancefield group D, most streptococci are very resistant to lysozyme lysis (Smith, 1973).Lysozyme (N-acetylmuramidase, EC 3.2.1.17) exerts its lytic effect through hydrolysis of specific glycosidic linkages in its substrate, the peptidoglycan of the bacterial cell wall. Streptococci, and especially strains of S. mutans and S. snnguis, are considered refractory to lysozyme action (Gibbons et al., 1966) and few studies have shown lysis of S. mutans cell walls with the enzyme alone (Coleman et al., 1970). Bacterial resistance to lysozyme may stem fror. several factors including the three-dimensional structure of peptidoglycan (Chiu et al., 1974 ;Formanek et al., 1974), the presence of teichoic acids covalently bound to peptidoglycan (Joseph & Shockman, 1975;Markham et al., 1975), the presence of unacetylated glucosamine residues in peptidoglycan (Hayashi et al., 1973) and surface adsorption of macromolecules from growth media (Chassy, 1976