2015
DOI: 10.1017/aee.2015.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Impediments to Embedding Education for Sustainability in Higher Education

Abstract: Higher education institutions have an unavoidable responsibility to address the looming economic, environmental and social crises imperilling humans and ecosystems by placing 'education for sustainability' at the heart of their concerns. Yet, for over three decades, the practice of 'higher education for sustainability' (HEfS) has encountered significant barriers to implementation, begging the question as to why. Drawing on a diverse, interdisciplinary literature, we identify four structural impediments to impl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To discuss the results about embedding ESD in the eight Latin American universities e the structure proposed by Gale, Davison, Wood, Williams, & Towle (2015) (Figure 3) was used. They found "that different disciplines attract different values" and understandings for sustainable development and it is one impediment to establish ESD in higher education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To discuss the results about embedding ESD in the eight Latin American universities e the structure proposed by Gale, Davison, Wood, Williams, & Towle (2015) (Figure 3) was used. They found "that different disciplines attract different values" and understandings for sustainable development and it is one impediment to establish ESD in higher education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis suggests that it is necessary an interdisciplinary dialogue towards ESD in Latin America where the view of the university as a competitive commercial enterprise (Tünnermann, 2003) needs to be challenged and maybe replaced by a more open and inclusive view that seeks the wellbeing of the different stakeholders including the community where the higher education institution operate. Adapted from the concept of Conceptions of sustainability in higher education institutions using Connelly´s approach (Gale, Davison, Wood, Williams, & Towle, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tilbury (2011) argues, the systemic complexity regarding ESD integration 'challenges university silos, corridors of power, and criteria and processes of decision-making'. Gale (2015) adds that there are four impediments to embedding ESD: 1. Contestation over sustainability; which challenges universities to seek a coherent approach to operationalisation 2.…”
Section: Esd Growth and Stagnationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Education for Sustainability (EfS) arena, government strategic educational policies also support the need for graduates with skills for interdisciplinary collaboration (Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2009;Scottish Government, 2010;Tilbury & Cooke, 2005), and this has led academics to establish interdisciplinary subjects and courses at many universities (Global University Network for Innovation, 2011; Jones, Selby, & Sterling, 2010). Nonetheless, the practice of implementing cross-faculty, interdisciplinary sustainability learning remains in its infancy, with key structural barriers remaining and new challenges arising, such as the corporatisation of higher education (Gale, Davison, Wood, Williams, & Towle, 2015;Granados-Sánchez et al, 2011). The literature on EfS in higher education identifies skills in interdisciplinary collaboration as critical for tackling complex and intractable issues (commonly referred to as 'wicked problems'), and sustainability and climate change are frequently cited as examples (Briggs, 2012;Jones & Watt, 2010; National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, 2005;Vincent & Focht, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%