1996
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.15.4.399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundations for the Learning and Instruction of Sport and Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
114
0
22

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
114
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The tactical model of teaching was derived from ideas of the teaching games for understanding (TgfU) model (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffin, 2006;Butler & Cahan, 2005) and presented a shift from an instructional approach emphasising learning technical skills called the traditional or technical model (Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996), for the dominant style of teaching of decision making skills. In the tactical model, teaching technical skills is reduced and follows after the understanding and practice of particular tactical principles, so that movement execution skills are learned in closer connection with the particular tactical problem (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffi n, 2006;Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tactical model of teaching was derived from ideas of the teaching games for understanding (TgfU) model (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffin, 2006;Butler & Cahan, 2005) and presented a shift from an instructional approach emphasising learning technical skills called the traditional or technical model (Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996), for the dominant style of teaching of decision making skills. In the tactical model, teaching technical skills is reduced and follows after the understanding and practice of particular tactical principles, so that movement execution skills are learned in closer connection with the particular tactical problem (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffi n, 2006;Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tactical model of teaching was derived from ideas of the teaching games for understanding (TgfU) model (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffin, 2006;Butler & Cahan, 2005) and presented a shift from an instructional approach emphasising learning technical skills called the traditional or technical model (Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996), for the dominant style of teaching of decision making skills. In the tactical model, teaching technical skills is reduced and follows after the understanding and practice of particular tactical principles, so that movement execution skills are learned in closer connection with the particular tactical problem (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffi n, 2006;Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996). However, previous studies on the effects of the tactical model in some sport games provided mixed or controversal results when this model did not demonstrate signifi cant benefi ts in the development of both the cognitive and motor components of game performance in comparison to the technical based instructional models (Harrison, Blakemore, Richards, Oliver, Wilkinson, & Fellingham, 2004;French, Werner, Taylor, Hussey, & Jones, 1996;Turner & Martinek, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Games like badminton, hockey, soccer, basketball players need to have a good command of game knowledge for quick movement to base, decision-making as to "what to do" and "how to do" right skill execution in game situation, speed and accuracy in executing skills at the right time in a game play [12,18,27,39]. Developing players' on these game configuration and specific game motor fitness are among many challenges faced by PE teachers through pedagogical approaches be it linear or non-linear methodology [4,20,37]. The TGfU model has non linear pedagogy elements seems to be popular game learning compare to linear model or known as skilled-based teaching or technical model [13].…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results provide evidence for the work of Grehaigne et al (2001), which states that decisions are only valid if they are transformed into appropriate actions. These results also support the conclusions of Rink, French, and Tjeerdsma (1996). When players are involved in a highly dynamic, ever-changing invasion/territorial game, in which decisions must be made quickly and in context of the game, many players may not be able to incorporate appropriate decisions because of the pace of the game and the constantly changing interaction of teammates and opponents.…”
Section: Tactical Knowledge and Tactical Performancesupporting
confidence: 76%