Teacher Involvement in High-Stakes Language Testing 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77177-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering Language Assessment Literacy Through Teacher Involvement in High-Stakes Test Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several commonalities may be discerned in the studies below. Except for Giraldo and Murcia (2019), the professional development initiatives did not last long periods of time but a week (for example, Baker & Riches, 2017) or three weeks (Kremmel et al, 2018), or even a few hours (Boyd & Donnarumma, 2018). The reason for this can be traced to a second commonality: All studies, except Giraldo and Murcia, involved in-service teachers who were not taking official courses and naturally were doing their in-service work.…”
Section: Professional Development Programs For Lalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several commonalities may be discerned in the studies below. Except for Giraldo and Murcia (2019), the professional development initiatives did not last long periods of time but a week (for example, Baker & Riches, 2017) or three weeks (Kremmel et al, 2018), or even a few hours (Boyd & Donnarumma, 2018). The reason for this can be traced to a second commonality: All studies, except Giraldo and Murcia, involved in-service teachers who were not taking official courses and naturally were doing their in-service work.…”
Section: Professional Development Programs For Lalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not mean these programs do not align with professional development principles at all. For example, Kremmel et al (2018) had teachers carefully analyze and improve test items and tasks, which required consistent reflection. Additionally, these programs respected teachers' voices to analyze language assessment issues (Boyd & Donnarumma, 2018;Nier et al 2009;Walters, 2010): Teachers had the chance to criticize policies for language learning, increased their awareness of language assessment, and reflected on how language assessment impacts students.…”
Section: Professional Development Programs For Lalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of language teachers, LAL research has had two related foci. First, there has been a predominantly diagnostic approach to LAL among teachers, with studies reporting that these stakeholders need to improve their LAL skills across the board (Fulcher 2012;Vogt & Tsagari, 2014), though with a special desire to design language assessments (Kremmel et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2017). Second, LAL research with classroom teachers has targeted their beliefs and practices (Giraldo, 2018b;López & Bernal, 2009;McNamara & Hill, 2011;Tsagari & Vogt, 2017).…”
Section: Research and Conceptual Insights On Language Assessment Litementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this background, the notion of Language Assessment Literacy (LAL), which refers to knowledge, skills and principles for the enterprise of language assessment (Davies, 2008;Fulcher, 2012), has become an all-encompassing theoretical framework to research, with special focus being drawn to in-service language teachers. In fact, our literature review reveals that studies on in-service teachers' LAL predominate this field of research (Arias & Maturana, 2005;Kremmel et al, 2017;López & Bernal, 2009;Sellan, 2017;Xun & Brown, 2017). Research has shown that, in general, inservice language teachers do need to improve their knowledge-particularly their design skills-in language assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…23 For further requirements of classroom-based exams, FL teachers can refer to specific guidelines (see BMBF, 2013). In the wake of these developments, assessment literacy and washback phenomena are gaining space in the Austrian research context (Hinger, 2016a;Frötscher, 2016Frötscher, , 2018Kremmel et al, 2018).…”
Section: Testing and Assessingmentioning
confidence: 99%