2002
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2002.11777179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering Critical Thinking through Effective Pedagogy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When critical thinking is defined for application to university contexts, the same key terms for critical thinking abilities or skills are found again and again, and include: questioning, evaluation, analysis, reflection, inference and judgment. Despite the range of views on the nature of critical thinking, there is widespread agreement in the literature that critical thinking in a university environment involves students' abilities to identify issues and assumptions, recognize important relationships, make correct inferences, evaluate evidence or authority, and deduce conclusions (Tsui, 2002).…”
Section: Critical Thinking In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When critical thinking is defined for application to university contexts, the same key terms for critical thinking abilities or skills are found again and again, and include: questioning, evaluation, analysis, reflection, inference and judgment. Despite the range of views on the nature of critical thinking, there is widespread agreement in the literature that critical thinking in a university environment involves students' abilities to identify issues and assumptions, recognize important relationships, make correct inferences, evaluate evidence or authority, and deduce conclusions (Tsui, 2002).…”
Section: Critical Thinking In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that instructors can nurture critical thinking in the classroom by: (a) facilitating class discussion to engage students (e.g., Tsui, 2002), (b) providing problemsolving activities such as cases to allow students to practice critical thinking skills (Klebba & Hamilton, 2001), (c) inviting students to integrate ideas from different disciplines and work experiences (Currie & Knights, 2003), and (d) asking students higher order review questions (Renaud & Murray, 2007). Downloaded by [Laurentian University] at 13:40 09 October 2014 Tsui's (2006) holistic and grounded study provides a helpful framework for understanding how content and process can facilitate critical thinking.…”
Section: Nurturing Students' Critical Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the tendencies for interdisciplinary courses to encourage a comparative analysis of multiple disciplinary perspectives (Lattuca, Voigt, and Fath, 2004), the act of making integrative connections among bodies of knowledge fosters students' critical development. For example, the work of Tsui (1999Tsui ( , 2001Tsui ( , 2002 analyzed self-reported gains in critical thinking for a national sample of college students, concluding that enrollment in interdisciplinary courses was positively correlated with problemsolving abilities. She further argued that part of the reason for this relationship is the type of instructional techniques commonly used in interdisciplinary instruction such as frequent interaction with instructors and peers and an outof-the-box orientation toward intellectual work (Tsui, 2007).…”
Section: Defining Interdisciplinary Curricula In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It begins with a brief outline of the extant research related to student learning and development in college. Certainly much of this process entails higher-order cognitive skills such as learning how to learn, gaining social and emotional maturity, engaging in critical thinking, and being an independent learner (King, 2000;Lattuca, Voigt, and Fath, 2004;Tsui, 2002). Working from a sociocultural perspective, it focuses on the nature of these skills as highly discipline specific.…”
Section: Interdisciplinarity Learning and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 98%