Enhancing Critical Thinking by Teaching Two Distinct Approaches to Management

Abstract

The authors explore the effect on students' critical thinking of teaching only one approach to management versus teaching two approaches to management. Results from a quasiexperiment-which included a survey, interviews, and case analysis-suggest that compared with students who are taught only a conventional approach to management (which emphasizes maximizing productivity, profitability, and competitiveness), students who are taught a conventional and an alternative approach (which seeks to balance multiple forms of well-being for multiple stakeholders) exhibit enhanced critical thinking. Implications for management education are discussed.

Sustainable marketing based on virtue ethics: addressing socio-ecological challenges facing humankind

“…First, SET marketing provides tools to address pressing sustainability issues that students will face during their careers. Second, teaching SET alongside FBL and/or TBL marketing will compel students to think outside the utilitarian box and thereby improve their critical thinking (Dyck et al 2012 ) and their ability to challenge mainstream self-fulfilling prophecies (Ferraro et al 2005 ).…”

Critical Thinking and Reflective Learning in the Marketing Education Literature: A Historical Perspective and Future Research Needs

“…Although considerable debate remains about how critical thinking should be defined and measured, we advocate for adopting Abrami et al’s (2015) perspective that critical thinking is an activity and critical thinking skills are cognitive abilities. These cognitive abilities encompass a continuum of critical thinking skills across two primary dimensions acknowledged in the literature—technical reasoning and philosophical assessment (Dyck, Walker, Starke, & Uggerslev, 2012; Hay, Peltier, & Drago, 2004). Critical thinking as technical reasoning involves a range of cognitive processing activities such as active processing, logical assessment, analytical thinking, and problem resolution.…”

Getting lost to find direction: Grounded theorizing and consciousness-raising in management education

“…For Dwyer et al (2014), the pedagogic stance should enhance “reflective judgement,” which is “an individuals’ understanding of the nature, limits, and certainty of knowing and how this can affect how they defend their judgments and reasoning in context” (p. 691). So pedagogy can provide a “heightened awareness of multiple points of view and context, as well as the evaluation of one’s own thought processes before reaching a conclusion” (Dyck et al, 2012: 344) and so teach students and future managers how to “make decisions in complex situations” (Glen et al, 2014: 663).…”