2019
DOI: 10.17502/m.rcs.v7i2.262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foros híbridos, participación y gestión sostenible del Patrimonio Mundial. El caso de Santa Ana de Cuenca

Abstract: Desde 1992, el modelo de desarrollo sostenible ha sido adoptado en las agendas para el desarrollo a nivel mundial. El paradigma supone que los recursos finitos deben gestionarse racionalmente a través de los múltiples actores sociales para asegurar el desarrollo humano presente y futuro. En este contexto, la UNESCO ha asumido que el patrimonio mundial, como recurso finito, debe gestionarse colaborativamente. Sin embargo, la práctica real de estos preceptos requiere de metodologías que hasta ahora han sido esca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since not all parishes have the same population density (INEC, 2010), the sample was stratified to improve balance. Given the lack of studies that use probability sampling to study perceptions on WH (Molina, 2019a, b), we drew on the surveys on citizen perception of Cultural Heritage conducted out in Edinburgh (Edinburgh Council, 2011) and Victoria, Australia (The Heritage Council of Victoria, 2014). In addition, we collected data on the local context generated from primary sources, such as budgets, programs and projects of all the local public institutions involved in heritage management.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since not all parishes have the same population density (INEC, 2010), the sample was stratified to improve balance. Given the lack of studies that use probability sampling to study perceptions on WH (Molina, 2019a, b), we drew on the surveys on citizen perception of Cultural Heritage conducted out in Edinburgh (Edinburgh Council, 2011) and Victoria, Australia (The Heritage Council of Victoria, 2014). In addition, we collected data on the local context generated from primary sources, such as budgets, programs and projects of all the local public institutions involved in heritage management.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point for our article is a critical perspective on the mismatch between the community's perception of heritage values and the OUV recognized in the WH designation. The OUVs used to justify Cuenca's inclusion on the List are neither understood nor perceived by the inhabitants of the town, as we have stated in other works (Molina, 2019a, b). While community perceptions are to do with the predominantly social, cultural and political uses of heritage, the OUVs defined in the nomination process are based on technical reasons and highlight the values that increase the chances of being awarded WH status (Avrami and Mason, 2019;Van der Hoeven, 2020;Clark, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…La mala percepción sobre la gestión turística a nivel local se evidenció en la limitada participación económica y en la escasa gestión del sitio; esto último, resultado de las diversas formas de entender la participación por parte de las instituciones. Molina (2019), en cambio, identifica elementos de convergencia entre agentes del proceso participativo, y aplica la estrategia de foros híbridos en Santa Ana de Cuenca, en Ecuador. Para ello, basándose en la propuesta de Michael Callon, Piere Lascoumes y Yanick Barthe (2009), desarrolló un método de diálogo abierto para identificar las discrepancias entre la sociedad y los gestores.…”
Section: Impactos Sociales Y La Participación En El Patrimonio Mundialunclassified