2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation of Anisotropic Strength Criteria for Cohesionless Granular Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial fabric tensor norm of the four tests is the same, thus Figure 3B shows that A n decreases with increasing δ . Therefore, smaller δ corresponds to smaller C in Equation (13), resulting in greater H and greater peak strength, matching the physical and numerical test observations 62–67 …”
Section: Model Formulation Unifying the Effects Of Principal Stress Vsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial fabric tensor norm of the four tests is the same, thus Figure 3B shows that A n decreases with increasing δ . Therefore, smaller δ corresponds to smaller C in Equation (13), resulting in greater H and greater peak strength, matching the physical and numerical test observations 62–67 …”
Section: Model Formulation Unifying the Effects Of Principal Stress Vsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This is a debatable issue, as there are both tests showing smallest peak stress ratio at α = 60° 35,81 and α = 90° 82–84 . The present model does not consider this minimum shear strength at α = 60°, but if it were found to be desired, variations of the strength formulation by Cao et al 62 can be adopted in the formulation of the peak mobilized stress ratio surface.…”
Section: Model Performance For Laboratory Tests On Toyoura Sandmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figs. 2(b and g) also clearly exhibit the anisotropy in both peak shear strength and shear modulus for samples with different initial bedding plane angles, which has been studied in detail in existing literature (Pietruszczak and Mroz 2000;Fu and Dafalias 2011;Cao et al 2017). At ε p q of 0.5, the deviatoric stress ratios of the eight samples evolve toward the same value, and the volumetric strains in Figs.…”
Section: Stress Strain and Dilatancy Ratiomentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The classical isotropic failure criteria was generalized to anisotropic criteria by Tian and Yao (2017) using an anisotropic transformed stress method. Cao et al (2016) extended the L-D criterion to be an anisotropic L-D criterion by introducing a strength variable Λ related to stress tensor and the orientation of bedding plane and the obtained formula can also generalized the isotropic M-C and M-N criterion to become anisotropic. In addition, there are also various cross-isotropic strength criteria for geomaterials to characterize the stress-strain-strength anisotropy by introducing variables that include the information of material fabric and external loading into classical isotropic strength criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%