2013
DOI: 10.1111/cpsp.12030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation in cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder: Aligning therapists, perceptions and practice.

Abstract: The aim was to examine the impact of training on cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) formulation skills.Eighty-five clinicians were randomly assigned to two experimental conditions. The experimental manipulation was the timing of assessment of formulation skills, that is, either before or after participation in a training workshop. The preworkshop results suggest that there may be a gap between self-appraisal and actual performance on a formulation task. Formulation skills of clinicians were significantly better … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
23
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Case conceptualization is viewed as a "first principle" of CBT (Beck, 1985;Johnstone & Dallos, 2013). As such, most published measures designed to assess the quality of case conceptualizations are grounded in the CBT tradition and this ended up being the focus of the current review; the majority of quality scales reviewed were grounded in a CBT framework (Dudley et al, 2010;Fothergill & Kuyken, 2002;Haarhoff et al, 2011;Padesky et al, 2011;Page et al, 2008;Zivor et al, 2013), with one scale theoretically neutral (Eells et al, 2005) and another embedded in the five Ps formulation template (McMurran et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Case conceptualization is viewed as a "first principle" of CBT (Beck, 1985;Johnstone & Dallos, 2013). As such, most published measures designed to assess the quality of case conceptualizations are grounded in the CBT tradition and this ended up being the focus of the current review; the majority of quality scales reviewed were grounded in a CBT framework (Dudley et al, 2010;Fothergill & Kuyken, 2002;Haarhoff et al, 2011;Padesky et al, 2011;Page et al, 2008;Zivor et al, 2013), with one scale theoretically neutral (Eells et al, 2005) and another embedded in the five Ps formulation template (McMurran et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, RQCFO's use within OCD is limited and is therefore not easily applicable in routine clinical services and to clients who present with a range of mental health problems. Zivor et al (2013) found the correlation between two blind raters on the "overall quality" dimension to be significant (r = .70, p < .005). The scale has not undergone rigorous psychometric evaluation, limiting conclusions that can be drawn about the validity of the measure.…”
Section: Rating the Quality Of Case Formulation Formentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, it was predicted that more experienced clinicians would be more likely to endorse practices related to using evidence in CF, as these practices may reflect higher levels of skill using theory to inform practice. Furthermore, research has documented that training also seems to improve CBT-based CF skills (e.g., Dudley, Ingham, Sowerby, & Freeston, 2015; Haarhoff, Gibson, & Flett, 2011; Zivor, Salkovis, Oldfield, & Kushir, 2013). Accordingly, the third hypothesis tested was that clinicians with higher levels of training would endorse more practices related to use of external evidence, on the basis that use of external evidence may be considered a more advanced CF skill.…”
Section: Study Aims and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While case formulation skills can improve with instruction, the current quality of training itself is of question (Berry, Barrowclough, & Wearden, ; Sim et al., ; Zivor, Salkovskis, & Kushnir, ). Sim et al.…”
Section: Disconcerting Status Of Clinician Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%