2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forms and functions of SMS messages: A study of variations in a corpus written by adolescents

Abstract: International audienceThe purpose of this research was to gain insights into SMS communication among French-speaking adolescents. We analyzed the effects of the writers' characteristics (age, gender, and SMS-messaging experience) on message length (number of characters and number of words), dialogue structure (with or without an opening and a closing), and message function (informative vs. relational). The SMS messages were produced in a realworld situation. We found differences across writers’ characteristics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The text messages, which were produced spontaneously in everyday-life situations, had a stable average length throughout the year of seven words, 30 characters. In a previous study carried out by Bernicot, Volckaert-Legrier, Goumi, and Bert-Erboul (2012b) and by Goumi, Volckaert-Legrier, Bernicot, and Bert-Erboul (2011), 15-to 18-year-old adolescents were shown to produce messages that were 20 words, 100 characters in length. Message length thus may be linked to age, but also to the type of communication device being used: a small screen only contains 160 characters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The text messages, which were produced spontaneously in everyday-life situations, had a stable average length throughout the year of seven words, 30 characters. In a previous study carried out by Bernicot, Volckaert-Legrier, Goumi, and Bert-Erboul (2012b) and by Goumi, Volckaert-Legrier, Bernicot, and Bert-Erboul (2011), 15-to 18-year-old adolescents were shown to produce messages that were 20 words, 100 characters in length. Message length thus may be linked to age, but also to the type of communication device being used: a small screen only contains 160 characters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information services and sales are facilities or services regarding specifications or information about goods or services that will be offered and provided by the company for prospective customers so that the goods or services can attract consumer interest [1,3,15]. Each customer has a level of demand for different products, so we need a service that can provide information more quickly and accurately and make customers feel satisfied.…”
Section: Results and Analysis 31 Information Services And Salesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ya existen bastantes estudios que ahondan en la ruptura respecto al texto escrito que suponen los nuevos géneros surgidos en internet (Baron, 2008;Herring, 2010;Rosen, Chang, Erwin, Carrier & Cheever, 2010;Bernicot, Volckaert-Legrier, Goumi & Bert-Erboul, 2012;López Quero, 2013, 2017, pero este no es nuestro objetivo, ya que nos proponemos ver hasta qué punto el género wasap se aproxima al género conversación coloquial. En este sentido tenemos también de nuevo en cuenta el trabajo de Mancera y Pano (2013) en el que las autoras reflexionan sobre el español coloquial en las redes sociales y la variación lingüística que se introduce en ellas.…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified
“…Como ya indican Mancera y Pano (2013: 11) existe una cierta convergencia de canales entre los géneros digitales, ya que "los canales de chat […], el correo electrónico, los foros o los blogs presentan unas dinámicas que los acercan, en distintos grados, a la conversación". Por ello, no queremos hablar de ruptura, como hicieron previamente Baron (2008), Bernicot et al (2012), Herring (2010) o López Quero (2013, 2017. Creemos que es más coherente hablar de un continuo entre la oralidad y la escritura, postulado próximo a los de Yus (2011), Alcántara (2014) o Mancera y Pano (2013).…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified