2018
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/psx144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of the young compact cluster GM 24 triggered by a cloud–cloud collision

Abstract: High-mass star formation is an important step which controls galactic evolution. GM 24 is a heavily obscured star cluster including a single O9 star with more than ∼100 lower mass stars within a 0.3 pc radius toward (l, b) ∼ (350.• 5, 0.• 96), close to the Galactic min-starburst NGC 6334. We found two velocity components associated with the cluster by new observations of 12 COJ= 2-1 emission, whereas the cloud was previously considered to be single. We found the distribution of the two components of 5 km s −1 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(40 reference statements)
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fukui et al (2018a,b) suggest that the formation of massives stars in NGC 6357, NGC 6334, and GM1-24 have been triggered by a cloud-cloud collision. However, while NGC 6357 and GM1-24 show the typical depression feature (cavity) and velocity bridge (between the molecular emission at the two velocity components assigned to the two colliding clouds), signature expected from cloud-cloud collision models (e.g., Fukui et al 2018c), this is not so clear for NGC 6334 because the molecular emission at the velocity components assigned to the two colliding clouds show similar spatial distributions. Fukui et al (2018a) estimated that in NGC 6334 and NGC 6357 a cloud of V LSR ∼ −16 km s −1 collided with a main cloud at V LSR ∼ −4 km s −1 (relative collision radial veloc-ity of 12 km s −1 ) while for GM1-24, Fukui et al (2018b) estimate that the colliding and the main clouds have V LSR ∼ −10 km s −1 and −6 km s −1 respectively (relative collision radial velocity of 4 km s −1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fukui et al (2018a,b) suggest that the formation of massives stars in NGC 6357, NGC 6334, and GM1-24 have been triggered by a cloud-cloud collision. However, while NGC 6357 and GM1-24 show the typical depression feature (cavity) and velocity bridge (between the molecular emission at the two velocity components assigned to the two colliding clouds), signature expected from cloud-cloud collision models (e.g., Fukui et al 2018c), this is not so clear for NGC 6334 because the molecular emission at the velocity components assigned to the two colliding clouds show similar spatial distributions. Fukui et al (2018a) estimated that in NGC 6334 and NGC 6357 a cloud of V LSR ∼ −16 km s −1 collided with a main cloud at V LSR ∼ −4 km s −1 (relative collision radial veloc-ity of 12 km s −1 ) while for GM1-24, Fukui et al (2018b) estimate that the colliding and the main clouds have V LSR ∼ −10 km s −1 and −6 km s −1 respectively (relative collision radial velocity of 4 km s −1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, while NGC 6357 and GM1-24 show the typical depression feature (cavity) and velocity bridge (between the molecular emission at the two velocity components assigned to the two colliding clouds), signature expected from cloud-cloud collision models (e.g., Fukui et al 2018c), this is not so clear for NGC 6334 because the molecular emission at the velocity components assigned to the two colliding clouds show similar spatial distributions. Fukui et al (2018a) estimated that in NGC 6334 and NGC 6357 a cloud of V LSR ∼ −16 km s −1 collided with a main cloud at V LSR ∼ −4 km s −1 (relative collision radial veloc-ity of 12 km s −1 ) while for GM1-24, Fukui et al (2018b) estimate that the colliding and the main clouds have V LSR ∼ −10 km s −1 and −6 km s −1 respectively (relative collision radial velocity of 4 km s −1 ). Considering the age difference between NGC 6334 (between 0.7 and 2.3 Myr, Getman et al 2014) and NGC 6357 (1-1.3 Myr, Fang et al 2012;Getman et al 2014), Fukui et al (2018b) propose that the main part of NGC 6357 collided first and only then did the collision toward NGC 6334 occur and it is still developing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They trace a 100-pc long feature aligned with the Galactic plane at b ∼ 0.67 • (20 pc above the Galactic plane at a distance of 1.75 kpc) which could trace the parental filament of both A134, page 14 of 42 star-forming regions. In this scheme, following Fukui et al (2018) the formation of NGC 6357 and NGC 6334 could have been triggered by a pc-scale cloud-cloud collision.…”
Section: Ngc 6357 and Ngc 6334 Historymentioning
confidence: 99%